期刊文献+

饥饿营销情境下产品虚位的积极稀缺效应 被引量:3

Positive Scarcity Effect of Product Phantom under Hunger Marketing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代社会中,企业常常利用人们物以稀为贵的消费心理来推广新产品和高端产品,饥饿营销策略应运而生。饥饿营销的一个重要效果是很多消费者无法立刻购买到产品却又得到了产品信息,即消费者需要面对产品虚位现象,他们不得不选择等待或者选择放弃。有效的饥饿营销策略在于引发了消费者对产品虚位的积极稀缺效应。本文通过两个实验证实了,启动消费者的竞争性思维模式可以显著提高消费者对暂时不可得的虚位产品评价。在启动竞争性思维模式影响消费者虚位产品评价的过程中,虚位竞争意愿起到了中介作用。此外,消费者决策环境中不存在企业故意制造虚位的消极信息是上述过程的边界条件,当消费者获得有关企业故意制造虚位的消极信息后,启动竞争性思维模式将无法显著提高消费者对虚位产品的评价。 Nowadays enterprises always promote new products and luxuries by making use of consumers' idea that "it's dear if it's rare", which bring out hunger marketing. The key to efficient hunger marketing is to motivate positive scarcity effect of product phantom. Based on two experiments, this study verifies that priming competitive mindset can increase consumers' evaluation of temporarily unavailable product phantom significantly. The competition willingness of phantom serves as intermediary in the process of priming competitive mindset to affect phantom product evaluation. Besides, no negative message about companies' making phantoms deliberately is the boundary condition to such process. Once consumers learn that companies made phantoms deliberately, priming competitive mindset will no longer improve phantom product's evaluation significantly
出处 《中大管理研究》 CSSCI 2015年第3期162-188,共27页 China Management Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“产品虚位现象与消费者反应机制的研究”(71372099)资助 首都经济贸易大学2015年度科研基金项目成果(00191554410220)
关键词 饥饿营销 竞争性思维模式 产品虚位 稀缺效应 hunger marketing, competitive mindset, product phantom, scarcity effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献54

二级参考文献19

  • 1翟双.中国人的求同心理[J].社会心理科学,2006,21(5):31-35. 被引量:4
  • 2Lynn Michael. Scarcity Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naive Economic Theories [ J ]. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 1992, (13): 67-78.
  • 3Brehm Sharon S., Jack W Brehm. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and control [ M ]. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
  • 4Cialdlni Robert B.. Influence: Science and Practice [ M ].Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman,1985.
  • 5Kelman Herbert C.. Attitude Change as a Function of Response Restriction[J]. Human Relations, 1953, (6): 185-214.
  • 6West Stephen G.. Increasing the Attractiveness of College Cafeteria Food: A Reactance Theory Perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, (60) : 656 - 658.
  • 7Verhallen Theo M. M., Henry S. J. Robben. Scarcity and Preference: An Experiment on Unavailability and Product Evaluation[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1994, ( 15 ) :315 - 331.
  • 8Inman J. Jeffrey, Anil c. Peter, Priya Raghubir. Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value[J].Journal of Consumer Research, 1997, (24) : 68- 79.
  • 9Fromkin Howard L., Timothy C. Brock. A Commodity Theory Analysis of Persuasion [ J]. Representative Research in Social Psycholog , 1971, (2) : 47 - 57.
  • 10Fromkin Howard L.. Affective and Valuational Consequences of Self- Perceived Uniqueness Deprivation [ M ]. Ph. D.Dissertation, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1968.

共引文献66

同被引文献19

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部