2Abrahamson.E. Managerial fads and fashions:the diffusion and rejection of innovations[J].Academy of Management Review,1991.586-612.
3Anderson,S. W,Young,S. M. The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems[J].Accounting,Organizations and Society,1999.525-559.
4Anderson,S. W. A framework for assessing cost management system changes:the case of activity-based costing implementation at General Motors 1986 ～1993[J].Journal of Management Accounting Research,1995.1-51.
5Barley,S.R,Tolbert,P.S. Institutionalization and structuration:studying the links between action and institution[J].Organization Studies,1997,(01):93-117.
6Briers,M,Chua,W. F. The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change:a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing[J].Accounting,Organizations and Society,2001.237-269.
7Burns,J,Scapens,R. W. Conceptualizing management accounting change:an institutional framework[J].Management Accounting Research,2000.3-25.
8Cobb,J,Innes,J,Mitchell,F. Activity-based costing:problems in practice[M].London,UK:Chartered Institute of Management Accountants,1992.
9Cooper,R. B,Zmud,R. W. Information technology implementation research:a technological diffusion approach[J].Management Science,1990.123-139.doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123.
10Covaleski,M. A,Dirsmith,M.W,Michelman,J. E. An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework,case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations[J].Accounting,Organizations and Society,1993.65-80.
