期刊文献+

承德市木兰围场不同强度间伐对油松人工林生长的影响

Effect of Various Intensities on the Growth of Pinus tabuliformis Plantation in Mulan Enclosure of Chengde City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以河北省承德市木兰围场北沟阳坡中龄油松人工林为研究对象,研究不同间伐强度下油松林的生长.结果表明随间伐强度增加,胸径和冠幅均呈现逐渐变大的趋势,但超强度间伐的胸径和冠幅均小于强度间伐.树高生长在强度间伐时最小.间伐有助于人工油松林的林分生长,且随着间伐强度的加大林分生长较好,但超强度的间伐并不一定是最合适的.调查地原密度1815株hm^-2的油松人工林,在保留密度900-1000株hm^-2时林分生长情况最好,这说明原密度1815株hm^-2的油松人工林最适宜中度到强度间伐,间伐最适强度为40%-50%. Taking middle-aged Pinus tabuliformis plantation in sunny slope of north ditch in Mulan Enclosure of Chengde City in Hebei Province as research objects,growth of Pinus tabuliformis under different thinning intensities were studied.Result shows that:diameter and crown show a progressively larger trend with the increase of thinning intensity,but DBH and crown with super thinning are less than that with thinning.Height growth is the minimum during great thinning.Thinning helps the growth of Pinus tabuliformis plantation;the growth of stand is optimal with the increase of thinning intensity.Super-strength thinning is not necessarily the most appropriate.Speaking for the investigation,the growth of Pinus tabuliformis plantation with original density (1 81 5 trees hm-2 )is the opti-mal under the reserved density being 900-1 000 plants hm-2 ;it is the most suitable for the original density(1 81 5 trees hm-2 )of Pinus tabuliformis to be conduct moderate thinning and great-intensity thinning,the optimal intensi-ty of thinning is from 40% to 50%.
作者 赵渺
出处 《防护林科技》 2015年第12期11-13,23,共4页 Protection Forest Science and Technology
关键词 油松 人工林 间伐 植物多样性 Pinus tabulaeformis plantation thinning plant diversity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1吴际友,龙应忠,童方平,余格非,胡蝶梦.湿地松人工林间伐效果初步研究[J].林业科学研究,1995,8(6):630-633. 被引量:27
  • 2Barreto P, Amaral P, Vidal E, et al. 1998. Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia. For Ecol Man, 108:9~26.
  • 3Battles J J, Shlisky A J, Barrett RH, et al. 2001. The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest.For Ecol Man, 146: 211 ~ 222.
  • 4董鸣.Survey,Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities[M].Beijing: China Standards Press,1996.62-63.
  • 5Manley A, Richardson J. 1995. Silviculture and economic benefits of producing wood energy from conventional forestry systems and measures to mitigate negative impacts. Biomass Bioenergy, 9:89~105.
  • 6Mielikainen K, Hynynen J. 2003. Silvicultural management in mainraining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-boreal zone:Case Finland. J Environ Man, 67: 47 ~ 54.
  • 7Okuda T, Suzuki M, Adachi N, et al. 2003. Effect of selective logging on canopy and stand structure and tree species composition in a lowland dipterocarp forest in peninsular Malaysia. For Ecol Man,175:297~ 320.
  • 8Pariona W, Fredericksen TS, Licona JC. 2003. Natural regeneration and liberation of timber species in logging gaps in two Bolivian tropical forests. For Ecol Man, 181:313 ~ 322.
  • 9Parrotta JA, Francis JK, Knowles OH. 2002. Harvesting intensity affects forest structure and composition in an upland Amazonian forest. For Ecol Ma n, 169: 243 ~ 255.
  • 10Robert L, Bradley BD, Titus KH. 2001. Does shelterwood harvesting have less impaction forest floor nutrient availability and microbial properties than clearcutting. Biol Fert Soils, 34:162 ~ 169.

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部