期刊文献+

血管内皮生长因子MR靶向对比剂的制备及其在乳腺癌裸鼠模型的MR实验研究 被引量:3

Preparation of MR Contrast Agent of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Rectptor-targeted and its Experimental Study in MR Imaging in the Mice Model Implanted with Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的制备靶向血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)受体的Gd-DTPA脂质体及其对裸鼠乳腺癌移植瘤的靶向性实验研究。方法制备出VEGF抗体标记的Gd-DTPA脂质体,检测其理化性质。将16只乳腺癌移植瘤的裸鼠分为2组(n=8),分别经鼠尾静脉注射Gd-DTPA、抗VEGF-Gd-DTPA脂质体后0.5h、2h、4h、6h、12h、24h行磁共振成像扫描,计算肿瘤强化值。结果所制备的抗VEGF-Gd-DTPA脂质体具有纳米颗粒的特征,在动物实验研究上GdDTPA组强化峰值出现在0.5h,相对强化值为1.34±0.46;抗VEGF-Gd-DTPA脂质体组强化峰值均出现在2h,相对强化值为2.15±0.52。2组乳腺癌移植瘤2h、4h、8h、24h扫描时间点相对强化值比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),抗VEGF-GdDTPA组增强值高。结论 VEGF抗体修饰的Gd-DTPA脂质体能与肿瘤体内血管内皮因子受体结合,为肿瘤血管生成的影像诊断提供了新的思路。 Objective To prepare target Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Rectptor gadopentetate dimeglumine liposome and study in MR imaging in the Mice Model implanted with breast Cancer. Methods Anti-VEGF-Gd-DTPA liposome was prepared, and the physical and chemical properties were detected.The Breast cancer transplantated nude mice were divided into 2 groups(n=8). Anti-VEGF-Gd-DTPA liposome and Gd-DTPA were injected into the nude mice. After 30 min, 2h, 4h, 8h, 24 h, The tumor enhancement rate was calculated. Results The prepared Anti-VEGF-Gd-DTPA liposomes were characterized as nanoparticles. In vivo MRI, The group of Gd-DTPA resulted in a maximum tumor REV of 1.34±0.46 at 30 min, The group of anti-VEGFGd-DTPA liposome resulted in a maximum tumor REV of 2.15±0.52 at 2h. In 2 groups of breast cancer, 2, 4, 8h,24 h scan time points were compared, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05), the anti-VEGF-Gd-DTPA group was the highest REV. Conclusion VEGF antibody modified Gd-DTPA liposome can target the tumor vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor, which provides a new way of the tumor angiogenesis imaging diagnosis.
作者 刘民英
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2015年第12期1-3,共3页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基金 广东省医学科研基金(A2013376)
关键词 血管内皮生长因子 磁共振 对比剂 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Media
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1kennedy Dc, Duguay DR, Tay LL, et al. SERS detection and boron delivery to cancer cells using carborane labelled nanoparticles [J]. Chem Commun(Camb),2009,28(44): 6750-6752.
  • 2Medarova Z, Rashkovetsky L, Pantazopoulos P. Multparametric monitoring of tumor response to chemotherapy by noninvasive imaging [J]. Cancer Res, 2009, 69(3): 1182- llg9.
  • 3Li S, PR jevic M, Koller E, et al. Characterization of 1231- vascular endothelial growth factor-binding sites expressed on human tumour cells: possible implication for tumourscintigraphy[J]. Int J Cancer, 2001, 91 (6): 789-796.
  • 4Aime S, Dastru W, Crich SG, et al. Innovative magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic agents based on paramagnetic Gd (1 I I) complexes [J] . Biopolymers, 2002, 66 (6) : 419- 428.
  • 5Unger Ee, Totty wg, Neufel al. Magnet ic resonance using gadolinium 1 monoclonal antibody[J] d DM, et imaging abeled Invest Radiol, 1985, 20 (7): 693-700.
  • 6Lciani A, Olivier JC, Clement O, et al.61ucose-receptor MR imaging of tumors: study in mice with PEGylated paramagnetic niosomes. Radiology [J] , 2004,231(1): 135-142.
  • 7Woodle MC, Lasic DD. Sterically stabilized liposomes[J].Biochim Biophys Acta, 1992, 1113(2): 171- 199.
  • 8Fukumura D, Xavier R, sugiura T, et al. Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells[J]. Cell, 1998, 94 (6): 715-725.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部