期刊文献+

日本介入南海争端的新动向及新特点 被引量:6

New Dynamics and Features of Japan's Intervention in the South China Sea Dispute
下载PDF
导出
摘要 日本从上世纪90年代起开始介入南海问题,近年随着南海争端再度升温,日本的介入不断加剧和升级,已成为继美国之后另一个高调和强力干预南海问题的区外国家。与以往相比,近年日本的介入已呈现出许多新的动向和特点:一是加大制造"中国威胁论"的力度,全面反对中国的领土主权及政策主张;二是利用各种渠道推动南海争端多边化和国际化;三是以"支持能力建设"为名加强与东盟的海上安全合作;四是加快与美国的战略对接,构建日美联合干预体制;五是加强与美澳印的多边协调与合作,筹组遏制中国的"志同道合者"联盟。日本之所以加大介入南海争端,其理由并非像它所公开声称的那样,而是怀有更多、更广的目标。日本的介入虽然不至于对中国在南海维权和维稳构成颠覆性挑战,但由此产生的消极影响值得警惕。 Japan began to get involvedin the South China Sea issue in 1990s. With the recent escalation of the South China Sea dispute, Japan's intervention in it has got intense and upgraded, becoming another country out of the region that gets deeply involved with high profile in the South China Sea issue after the US. Compared with the past, Japan's intervention in recent years has shown many new dynamics and features: first, has intensified the propaganda of 'China Threat' and comprehensively opposed China's territorial sovereignty and policy initiatives; second, has promoted the multilateralization and internationalization of the South China Sea dispute through various channels; third, has strengthened maritime security cooperation with the ASEAN countries in the name of 'supporting their capacity building'; fourth, has sped up the strategic docking with the US and the construction of Japan-US joint intervention system; fifth, has strengthened the multilateral coordination and cooperation with the US, Australia and India, and been busy in forming a coalition of the 'like-minded' to contain China. The reason why Japan has intensified its intervention in the South China Sea dispute is not what it has openly expressed, but involves more and broader objectives. Although Japan's intervention does not pose subversive challenges to China's moves to defense her rights over and maintain stability in the South China Sea, the negative impact emerged from it calls for alert.
作者 杨光海
出处 《和平与发展》 CSSCI 2015年第5期96-113,129-142,共32页 Peace and Development
基金 2011年度国家社会科学基金项目"中国与东盟睦邻关系的建构研究"(项目批准号为11BGJ029)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1肯尼斯·华尔兹.《国际政治理论》,信强译,上海:上海人民出版社,2003年,第156页.
  • 2末川博.家永三郎监修,吉原公一郎.久保绫三编[日米安保条约体制史(2)],三省堂,1970年,192页.
  • 3末川博.家永三郎监修,吉原公一郎.久保绫三编[日米安保条约体制史(4)],三省堂,1970年,5页.
  • 4[1946年(昭和21年) 6月初日.帝国議会衆議院本会議における原夫次郎議員に対する吉田茂首相の答弁].[第九十回帝国議会衆議院議事速記録第六号」.3頁.
  • 5「衆議院外務委員会における下回武三外務省条約局長の答弁」,1953年8月5日.
  • 6山際澄夫.[安倍晋三と「宰相の資格],小学館,2006年,190頁.
  • 7「外相の改憲検討発言「近隣に警戒の念].[朝日新聞] 1993年1月9日.
  • 8「九条改正は考えてない」.[朝日新聞]. 1993年1月11日.
  • 9小沢一郎.[日本改造計画」,講談社,1993年.
  • 10「岐路突き進む首相」.[朝日新聞]. 2014年3月3日.

共引文献5

同被引文献132

  • 1于海龙.霸权国盟国间联盟化条件分析——以安倍政府时期日菲、日泰关系为例[J].日本学刊,2021(2):125-143. 被引量:2
  • 2陈小鼎,王翠梅.援助国是“经济人”还是“社会人”?——基于日本对华与对印ODA政策比较[J].当代亚太,2021(1):79-105. 被引量:7
  • 3《印美联合声明称担忧南海争端中方对此发出警告》,人民网,http://military.people.com.cn/n/2014/lOlO/c1011-25804265.html.
  • 4赵青海:《从“亚太”到“印太”》,国际网,http://memo.cfisnet.com/2013/0821/1296727.html.
  • 5Hillary Rodham Clinton, " America's Engagement in the Asia-Pacific", United States Department of Defense, October 28, 2010.
  • 6Hillary Rodham Clinton, "America's Pacific century", United States Department of Defense, October 11, 2011.
  • 7"Quadrennial Defense Review 2014", United States Department of Defense, March 4, 2014, p. 17.
  • 8Cf. Rory Medcalf, "The Indo-Pacific: What's in a Name?", American Interest, October 2013.
  • 9"Locklear Calls for lndo-Asia-Pacific Cooperation", US Department of Defense, February 8, 2013, http: //ar- chive, defense, gov/news/newsarticle, aspx? id = 119243.
  • 10"Maritime Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Region", May 31, 2013, http: //www. apcss, org/maritime - cooperation - in - the - Indo-Pacific - region/.

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部