期刊文献+

存在中间产品退出的混合型多阶段系统DEA效率评价 被引量:8

DEA efficiency evaluation of hybrid multi-stage system with intermediate measure exits
原文传递
导出
摘要 具有复杂结构的系统经常会存在初始投入在不同子阶段分配和中间产品非完全再投入并存的现象,在其效率评价中忽略中间过程的传统Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)模型往往会高估系统效率,而不考虑中间产品退出情形的网络DEA.模型对系统整体效率评价又可能偏低.为更好测算复杂结构系统的运行效率,基于企业技术创新的特征,建立同时考虑投入分配与中间产出分配问题的混合型多阶段系统DEA效率评价模型.依据分配比例测算各阶段效率,采用阶段效率的投入加权平均评价的系统整体效率,并计算模型的最优解.所提出的模型能够相对准确地反映复杂结构系统的特征,并深入系统"黑箱"内部,更大程度地为优化系统效率提供信息.对我国33个大中型工业企业的行业技术创新效率评价验证了模型的有效性. The assignment of initial input at different sub-stages and the incomplete reentry of intermediate output are often two co-existent phenomena for a system with complex structure. The traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models often overvalue system efficiency due to sub-process ignorance; while the network DEA models with the negligence of intermediate outputs exits probably underestimate the efficiency. For a better efficiency evaluation, this paper develops a DEA model for hybrid multi-stage system in consideration of input and intermediate output assignment issues and the system complex structure. The efficiency of sub-stage is evaluated in terms of the allocation proportion, the system overall efficiency is calculated by the input weighted average of sub-stages efficiency, and the optimum solution of the model is given at last. The proposed model can precisely reflect the structural feature of system and provide more valuable information for the system efficiency optimization by opening the "black box". A model application to the technological innovation efficiency evaluation of China's 33 large and medium-sized industrial enterprises by sector is introduced to verify the availability of the model.
作者 马建峰 何枫
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期2874-2884,共11页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71272160) 教育部科技委战略研究重大项目(KJW-A-1410) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(第46批)
关键词 效率评价 数据包络分析 多阶段系统 创新效率 efficiency evaluation data envelopment analysis multi-stage system innovation efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Lewis H F, Sexton T R. Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure[J]. Computers L: Operations Research, 2004, 31: 1365-1410.
  • 2Fare R, Whittaker G. An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995, 46(2): 201-213.
  • 3Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach[J]. Economics Letters, 1996, 50: 65-70.
  • 4Fare R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34: 35-49.
  • 5Kao C. Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196: 1107-1112.
  • 6韩松,魏权龄.网络DEA模型的生产理论背景[J].经济理论与经济管理,2012,32(4):40-44. 被引量:14
  • 7Chen Y, Liang L, Zhou J. Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches[J]. European Journal of Operational Rel search, 2009, 193: 600-604.
  • 8夏琼,杨锋,梁樑,吴华清.两阶段混联生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].系统管理学报,2012,21(1):1-5. 被引量:12
  • 9Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data development analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185: 418-429.
  • 10Yao C, Wade D C, Ning L, et al. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196:1170 -1176.

二级参考文献160

共引文献210

同被引文献115

引证文献8

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部