期刊文献+

影响起搏器植入患者生存率的预后因素

Factors influencing prognosis of survival rate of patients with pacemakers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过连续随访起搏器植入患者,观察长期右室起搏的患者生存情况及可能影响预后的危险因素。方法自1991年1月-2010年12月,因II度II型房室传导阻滞、III度房室阻滞、心房纤颤伴长间隙以及病态窦房结综合征等症状性缓慢心律失常植入永久起搏器的患者1 245例,自植入起搏器后进行连续随访,收集患者起搏器植入时的一般信息特征及伴随的疾病。采用Kaplan-Meier方法评估患者生存率。采用log Rank检验评价,单因素分析影响起搏器植入患者预后的危险因子,Cox多因素分析评估影响生存预后的独立危险因素。结果在3-23年的随访中,总的生存率为91.3%;5年生存率、10年生存率、15年生存率、〉20年生存率分别为92.9%,88.7%,81.9%和75.1%;单因素分析影响起搏器患者生存预后的危险因子有:年龄、性别、起搏模式、慢性肾功能衰竭、缺血性心肌病、扩张型心肌病;Cox多因素分析,影响起搏器植入患者生存预后的独立危险因素是:年龄、缺血性心肌病、扩张型心肌病。结论植入永久心脏起搏器患者的寿命显著延长,影响起搏器植入患者生存预后的独立危险因素是:起搏器植入时的年龄、缺血性心肌病和扩张型心肌病。 AIM To observe the long-term survival of patients with right ventricular pacing and to explore the risk factors that may affect the prognosis. METHODS A retrospective follow-up analysis was con- ducted in 1,245 patients implanted with permanent pacemaker from January 1991 to December 2010 for type II, degree II atrial-ventricular block, III degree atrial-ventricular block and auricular fibrillation with long interval and sick sinus syndrome such as slow cardiac arrhythmia. Follow-up data were continuously collected after pacemaker implantation until the endpoint. Survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan- Meier method and risk factors for mortality were sought using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards method. RESULTS The total survival rate during follow-up (3 -23 years) was 91.3% and the survival rates at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were, respectively, 92. 9% , 88.9% , 81.9% and 75. 1%. Single factor analysis showed that age, gender, pacemaker mode, chronic renal failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were the risk factors affecting the survival. Independent predictors of increased mortality were age at implant (hazard ratio, HR 1. 987; 95% confidence interval, CI 1. 587 - 2. 489), DCM ( HR 45.332; 95% CI 24. 321 - 84. 495 ) and ischemic cardiomyopathy ( HR 8.418 ;95% CI 3.605 - 19.65 ). CONCLUSION Implantation of permanent pacemaker prolongs the life of patients. Age at implant, ischemic cardiomyopathy and DCM are the independent risk factors for inereasedmortality.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2015年第6期690-694,共5页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 起搏器 随访研究 生存预后 预后因素 permanent pacemaker follow-up study prognosis of survival prognosis factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardi- ovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342(19) : 1385 - 1391.
  • 2Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual- chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(24) : 1854 - 1862.
  • 3Thambo JB, Bordachar P, Garrigue S, et al. Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chro- nic right ventricular apical pacing[ J ]. Circulation, 2004, 10 (25) : 3766 - 3772.
  • 4Yoshikawa H, Suzuki M, Tezuka N, et al. Differences in left ven- tricular dyssynchrony between high septal pacing and apical pacing in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function[ J]. J Cardiol, 2010, 56(1) :44 -50.
  • 5Nielsen J, Bottcher M, Nielsen Tr, et al. Regional myocardialbleed flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single-chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing-effect of pacing modeand rate[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000, 35(6) :1453 -1461.
  • 6Tse HF, Wong KK, Siu CW, et al. Impacts of ventricular rate regu- larization pacing at right ventricular apicalvs, septal sites On left ven- tricular function and exercise capacity in patients with permanent atri- al fibrillation [J]. Europace, 2009, 11(5) :594 -600.
  • 7Kypta A, Steinwender C, Kammler J, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing septal ventricular lead implantation compared with standard apical pacing [ J ]. Europace, 2008, 10(15) :574-579.
  • 8de Cock CC, Meyer A, Kamp O, et al. Hemodynamic benefits of right ventricular outflow tract pacing: comparison with right ventficular apex pacing[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 1998, 21 (3) :536 -541.
  • 9Van Oosterhout MF, Prinzen FW, Arts T, et al. Asynchronous elec- trical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricu- lar wall[J]. Circulation, 1998, 98(6) :588 -595.
  • 10Jelid V, Belkid K, Djordjevid M, et al. Surival in 1431 pacemaker patients: prognostic factors and comparison with the general popula- tion[J]. Pacing Clin Electroph ysiol , 1992, 15(2):141-147.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Kitzman DW,Edwards WD.Age-related changes in the anatomy human heart.J Gerontol,1990,45:33-35.
  • 2怀柯 译.心肌细胞的老化[J].国外医学:老年医学分册,1984,5:54-56.
  • 3Hsueh CW,Lee WL,Chen YT,et al.The incidence of coronary artery disease in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias.Jpn Heart J,2001,42:417-423.
  • 4Gervasio AL,John EO,et al.Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing.N Engl J Med,1998,338:1097-1104.
  • 5Charles RK,Stuart JC,Hoshiar A,et al.Canadian trial of physiological pacing effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up.Circulation,2004,109:357-362.
  • 6Lamas GA,Lee KL,Sweeney MO,et al.Ventricular pacing or dual chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction.N Engl J Med,2002,346:1854-1862.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部