期刊文献+

双通道技术评估睑板腺功能障碍性干眼患者的视觉质量 被引量:7

A double-pass method of evaluating the optical quality of dry eye caused by meibomian gland dysfunction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的利用双通道技术动态监测睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)性干眼患者眼球散射情况,来客观评价MGD性干眼患者的视觉质量。方法横断面研究。选取MGD性干眼患者56例(74眼,干眼组)及正常人31例(53眼,对照组)。对2组对象进行相关检查,包括泪液分泌试验(Sehirmer Ⅰ test,SIT)、泪膜破裂时间(BUT)、睑板腺分泌物评分、睑板腺缺失面积评分,以及利用双通道技术-OQAS-Ⅱ系统检测调制传递函数截止频率(MTFcutoff)、斯特列尔比(SR)、客观散射指数(OSD等参数。采用独立样本t检验分析MGD干眼组与对照组之间各参数的差异性,采用Pearson相关分析OSI均值与MTFcutoff、SR的相关性。结果干眼组SIT、BUT、睑板腺分泌物评分、睑板腺缺失面积评分、MTFcutoff、SR、OSI均值及标准差分别为(4.7±2.8)mm、(4.9±2.1)S、(3.0±1.2)分、(3.2±1.3)分、(24.41±9.12)c/deg、0.13±0.06、2.26±1.08、0.61±0.68,与对照组[(15.7±5.1)mm、(13.2±2.0)s、(0.5±0.2)分、(0.6±0.1)分、(37.24±7.04)c/deg、0.23±0.06、0.71±0.18、0.11±0.09]相比,差异有统计学意义(t=-15.815、-22.399、9.925、6.965、-8.574、-9.752、10.341、5.315,P〈0.05)。OSI均值与MTFcutoff、SR均呈负相关(r=-0.67、-0.60,P〈0.05)。结论双通道技术可用于客观评估MGD性干眼患者的视觉质量,表明泪膜改变造成的散射对MGD性干眼患者视网膜成像及视觉质量影响明显。 Objective To use double-pass technology to evaluate optical quality by dynamically analyzing the ocular light scatter of dry eye caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods In a noninterventional, cross-sectional study, results of the following tests were recorded in 56 patients (74 eyes) with dry eye caused by MGD and a control group of 31 participants (53 healthy eyes): Schirmer Ⅰ test, tear film break-up time (BUT), meibomiau gland grade, modulation transfer function cutoff (MTF cut off), Strehl ratio (SR), and objective scatter index (OSI). The differences between the two groups were compared for the MTF eutoff, SR, the average value of OSI and the corresponding standard deviation (SD-OSI). The correlations of OSI with MTF cut off and SR were analyzed. Results The result of Schirmer Ⅰ test, BUT, meibomian secretion score, miss rate of meibomian glands, MTF cut off, SR, OSI and SD-OSI in MGD dry eye group were as follows: 4.7±2.8, 4.9±2.1, 3.0±1.2, 3.2±1.3, 24.41±9.12, 0.13±0.06, 2.26±1.08 and 0.61±0.68. The corresponding results for the control group were: 15.7±5.1, 13.2±2.0, 0.5±0.2, 0.6±0.1, 37.24±7.04, 0.23±0.06, 0.71±0.18 and 0.11±0.09. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups (t=-15.815, -22.399, 9.925, 6.965, -8.574, -9.752, 10.341, 5.315, P〈0.05). Both the MTF cut off and SR were negatively correlated with OSI (r=-0.67, -0.60, P〈0.05). Conclusion Ocular light scatter in MGD dry eye patients greatly influences retinal images and optical quality.The double-pass technology, which is an objective method for evaluating optical quality, may play an important guidance role in the diagnosis and treatment of dry eye.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第11期668-672,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 卫生部行业专项基金(201302015)
关键词 双通道技术 散射 睑板腺功能障碍 干眼病 视觉质量 Double-pass technology Light scattering Meibomian gland dysfunction Xerophthalmia Optical quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Mont6s-Mic6 R. Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2007,33(9)..1631- 1635.
  • 2Shimazaki J, Sakata M, Tsubota K. Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1995,113 (10) : 1266-1270.
  • 3中华医学会眼科学分会角膜病学组.干眼临床诊疗专家共识(2013年)[J].中华眼科杂志,2013,49(1):73-75. 被引量:1271
  • 4万珊珊,杨燕宁,袁静,成进魁,赵巍.眼表综合分析仪评价干眼患者相关指标的临床分析[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2015,17(3):171-175. 被引量:36
  • 5Dlaz-Dout6n F, Benito A, Pujol J, et al. Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2006,47(4):1710-1716.
  • 6Ali6 JL, Pifiero DP, Ortiz D, et al. Clinical outcomes and postoperative intraocular optical quality with a microincision aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009,35 (9) : 1548-1554.
  • 7Prydal JI, Artal P, Woon H, et al. Study of human preeorneal tear film thickness and structure using laser interferometry[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1992,33 (6) :2006-2011.
  • 8Benedetto DA, Clinch TE, Laibson PR. In vivo observation of tear dynamics using fluorophotometry[J]. Arch Ophthalmol,1984, 102(3) :410-412.
  • 9Licznerski TJ, Kasprzak HT, Kowalik W. Application of twyman-green interferometer for evaluation of in vivo breakup characteristic of the human tear film[J]. J Biomed Opt,1999,4 (1) : 176-182.
  • 10Tutt R, Bradley A, Begley C, et al. Optical and visual impact of tear break-up in human eyes[J]. Invest Opbthalmol Vis Sei, 2000,41 ( 13 ) :4117-4123.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Foulks GN, Nichols KK, Bron A J, et al. Improving awareness, identification, and management of meibomian gland dysfunction [J]. Ophthalmology, 2012,119 (10) : S 1-12.
  • 2Wise RJ, Sobel RK, Allen RC. Meibography: A review of techniques and technologies[J]. Saudi J Ophthalmol,2012,26 (4) :349-356.
  • 3Ozcura F, Aydin S, Helvaci MR. Ocular surface disease index for the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome[J]. Ocul Immunol Inflamm, 2007,15 (5) : 389-393.
  • 4Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, et al. Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008,115 (5) : 911-915.
  • 5Kastelan S, Tomic M, Salopek-Rabatic J, et al. Diagnostic procedures and management of dry eye[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2013,2013 : 309-723.
  • 6Jackson WB. Management of dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Canadian consensus[J]. Can J Ophthalmol,2009,44(4):385-394.
  • 7Latkany R. Dry eyes: etiology and management[J]. Curt Opin Ophthalmol,2008,19(4) : 287-291.
  • 8Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS. Clinical evaluation of the Oculus Keratograph[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye,2012,35 (4): 171-174.
  • 9Srinivasan S, Menzies KL, Sorbara L, et al. Imaging meibomian glands on a patient with chalazia in the upper and lower lids: a case report[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye,2013,36(4):199-203.
  • 10Arita R, Suehiro J, Haraguchi T, et al. Objective image analysis of the meibomian gland area[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2014, 98(6) :746-755.

共引文献1290

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部