非受害国实施反措施的习惯国际法地位之探讨——兼评Elena Katselli Proukaki《The Problem of Enforcement in International Law》被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要反措施(countermeasures)作为一项从"报复"发展起来的国际法概念,具备较为丰富的法律确信和国家实践,并被绝大多数国际法学者认为已经具备习惯国际法的地位。自联合国国际法委员会开始编纂有关国家责任的条款之时,有关反措施实施主体能否为非受害国的争论一直没有停止。2010年希腊学者Elena Katselli Proukaiki在其著作《The Problem of Enforcement in International Law》中从法律确信和国家实践这两个方面认为,非受害国实施反措施已经具备习惯国际法地位。笔者认为,无论从国家法律确信还是国家实践,非受害国实施反措施是备受争议的,非受害国实施反措施不具备习惯国际法的地位。

作者季华

机构地区北京大学法学院

出处《云南大学学报（法学版）》 2015年第5期154-159,共6页 Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition

关键词反措施非受害国国家责任

分类号 D996 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Elena Katselli Proukaiki, The Problem of EnforCement in International Law, Routledge ,2011, chapter 3, pp. 110 - 210.
2Kadi v. Council of the European Union of the European Communities, Case C -402/05P, Judgment 3 September 2008.
3Achilles Skordas,Book Review on "The Problem of Enforcement in International Law by Elena Katselli Proukaiki", International Law and Comparative Law Quarter, 2011, pp. 284 -286.
4Elena Katselli Proukaiki, The Problem of Enforcement in International Law, Routledge ,2011, chapter 3, pp. 110 -210. o.
5Case concerning North Sea Continental Shelf Cases( 1969), op. cir. , 44, (77) ;Cases concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, (1988) ,108 -9, (207).
6State Responsibility: Comments and observations received from governments, 19 March 2001, UN General Assembly, A/CN. 4/515,pp. 79, 89.
7State Responsibility: Comments and observations received from governments, 19 March 2001, UN General Assembly, A/CN. 4/515,pp. 90 - 91.
8State Responsibility: Comments and observations received from governments, 19 March 2001, UN General Assembly, A/CN. 4/515,p. 89.
9State Responsibility: Comments and observations received from governments, 19 March 2001, UN General Assembly, A/CN. 4/515,p. :)4.
10UN General Assembly 55th session, Official Records, 6th Committee, Summary record the 15th meeting, A/C. 6/55/SR. 15, p. 5 ; A/C. 6/ 55/SR. 18,p. 11.