期刊文献+

前列舒通联合左氧氟沙星治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的临床疗效及安全性评价 被引量:18

Clinical efficacy and safety of Qianlieshutong capsule combined with levofloxacin in treatment of chronic bacteritic prostatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价前列舒通联合左氧氟沙星治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的临床疗效和安全性。方法将135例慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者随机分为试验组71例和对照组64例。试验组予以口服前列舒通,每次0.4 g,每日3次+左氧氟沙星,每次0.1 g,每日2次;对照组予以左氧氟沙星,每次0.1 g,每日2次。2组患者疗程均为2周。比较2组患者的临床疗效、细菌学疗效和不良反应发生率。结果试验组的有效率为60.56%显著优于对照组51.56%(P<0.05)。试验组的细菌清除率为100.00%显著优于对照组72.22%(P<0.05)。试验组和对照组的不良反应发生率分别为4.23%和3.13%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论前列舒通联合左氧氟沙星治疗前列腺炎的临床疗效确切,且不增加不良反应的发生率。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination of Qianlieshutong and levofloxacin in the treatment of pa- tients with chronic bacterial prostatitis. Methods One hundred thirty- five patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis were randomly divided into treatment group ( n = 71 ) and control group ( n = 64). Patients in treat- ment group were treated with qianlieshutong 0. 4 g, po, 3 times a day and levofloxacin 0. 1 g, twice a day. Patients in control group were trea- ted with levofloxacin 0. 1 g, twice a day. The course of treatment was 2 weeks in two groups. The clinical efficacy, bacteriological efficacy and incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups were com- pared. Results The effective rate of treatment group (60. 56% ) was significantly higher than that of control group (51.56%, P 〈 0. 05 ). The bacterial clear rate of treatment group (100. 00% ) was significantly higher than that of control group (72.22% , P 〈0. 05). The incidences of adverse reactions were 4.23% and 3.13% in the treatment group and control group respectively without statistical difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). The clinical efficacy of Qianlieshutong combine with levofloxacin in the treatment of prostatitis is exact, and without increasing incidence of adverse drug reactions.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第22期2187-2189,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 前列舒通 左氧氟沙星 前列腺炎 临床疗效 安全性 Qianlieshutong levofloxacin prostatitis clinical efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献41

  • 1孙颖浩.α1受体阻滞剂治疗良性前列腺增生研究进展[J].中华男科学杂志,2004,10(7):483-485. 被引量:24
  • 2席建元,贺菊乔,张熙,刘丽芳,卢芳国.前列散瘀胶囊治疗良性前列腺增生的临床观察[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(1):68-69. 被引量:6
  • 3周占松,宋波,卢根生,李为兵.慢性前列腺炎牵涉痛神经机制及其与膀胱、盆底肌的关系[J].解放军医学杂志,2005,30(12):1055-1057. 被引量:14
  • 4吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].山东:山东科学技术出版社,2007:1145-1151.
  • 5李仁魁 郭晓玲 张永旺等.前列疏通胶囊治疗良性前列腺增生症疗效观察.药物与临床,2011,:63-64.
  • 6Hetrick DC, Ciol MA, Rothman I, et al. Musculoskeletal dysfunc- tion in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome type m : a case-con- trol study[J]. J Urol, 2003,170(3) :828-831.
  • 7Mayer EA, Bradesis S. Aloserton and irritable bowel ayndrome [ J ]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2003,4 ( 11 ) :2089-2098.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部.中药新药临床研究指导原则(第3辑).1997:151,98.
  • 9Robertson C,Boyle P,Nonis A,et al.International population based study of urological conditions:the Urepik study. II. Comparative prostatitis data. J Uro1,1999,151 (4): 32A.
  • 10Wenninger K, Heiman JR, Rothman I, et al. Sickness impact of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis and its correlates. J Urol, 1996,155(3) :965.

共引文献344

同被引文献146

引证文献18

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部