对学术期刊实行“编校合一”的思考

Pondering on the Implementation of "Editing-Proofreading Integration" for Academic Journals

本文对目前出版界颇为盛行的"编校合一"制度进行了探讨。首先分析了"编校合一"的概念以及编辑与校对两个岗位的区别,并对越来越多的学术期刊实行"编校合一"的原因进行了分析,继而阐明了"编校合一"制度的科学性以及存在的弊端。认为在新时期下学术期刊实行"编校合一"制度具备科学性和可行性,其弊端可以通过合适的手段消除。

The ＂editing-proofreading integration＂ system prevailing in the current publishing field is explored in this paper. The definition of ＂editing-proofreading integration＂ and the difference between editing and proofreading are analyzed first, and the reasons why more and more academic journals are implementing ＂editing-proofreading integration＂ are also analyzed, and then the scientificalness and shortcomings of the ＂editing-proofreading integration＂ system are expounded. The writer holds that it is scientific and feasible to implement the ＂editing-proofreading integration＂ system for academic journals in the new situation, and the shortcomings can be eliminated through appropriate means.