期刊文献+

不同抛光方法对钴铬钼合金表面粗糙度的影响 被引量:1

The study on surface roughness of Co-Cr-Mo alloy trealed with differents polishing methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较机械抛光、化学抛光和电解抛光对钴铬钼合金试件表面粗糙度的影响。方法:制作钴铬钼合金试件60个,随机分为机械抛光组、化学抛光组和电解抛光组,对其表面进行抛光处理后,在不同氟浓度溶液里浸泡24h,记录试件抛光后的减重率(wt﹪),测量表面粗糙度Ra值,并用扫描电镜(SEM)观察试件表面形态变化。结果:相同氟浓度下,试件经过不同抛光处理后,减重率和表面粗糙度Ra值都有显著差异(P<0.05),不同氟浓度下,相同的抛光方法后,试件表面粗糙度有显著性差异(P<0.05)。扫描电镜观察,电解抛光后钴铬钼合金表面更加光滑,均匀一致。结论:应用电解抛光法处理钴铬钼合金试件其表面形貌更好。 Objective: To investigate the influence of mechanic polishing, chemical polishing and electrolytic polishing on Surface Roughness of Co-Cr-Mo alloy. Method: 60 Co-Cr-Mo alloy specimen were prepared and randomly divided into three groups, then differents surface polishing was made to each group separately. Then The weight loss ratio (wt % ) arid Ra value were measured. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to confirm the surface change of test samples. Result: The results showed that in the same F-solutlon, the weight-relief and surface roughness Ra value had significant difference (P 〈0.05) with differents polishing methods, but, with the same polishing method, the weight-relief and surface roughness Ra value had also significant difference (P 〈0.05) in different F-solution. SEM results showed that the surface of mechanic pol- ishing group were evident and that of chemical polishing group were not very evident. There were not marks on the surface of electrolytic polishing group. Conclusion: The surface roughness of Co-Cr-Mo alloy was inferior to that of electrolytic pol-ishing group.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2015年第11期645-648,共4页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 钴铬钼合金 表面粗糙度 机械抛光 化学抛光 电解抛光 Co-Cr-Mo alloy surface roughness mechanic polishing chemical polishing~ electrolytic polishing
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献67

共引文献59

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部