期刊文献+

交错性:心理学研究的新范式 被引量:3

Intersectionality: A New Paradigm in Psychology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,交错性理论成为心理学新的研究范式。交错性研究关注多元边缘化群体,认为个体是多元社会认同的整合,强调权力的关系性与社会认同的建构性,主张非累加的、多元建构的交错效应与多元方法的使用。将交错性引入心理学研究,具有重要的方法论意义:它有利于纠正传统心理学研究的社会认同同质化的本质主义倾向,揭示群体生活的复杂性以权力与社会不平等的生产机制,厘清知识与权力的关系,为更好地理解与研究社会现象的复杂情境、促进心理学方法论的变革、推动社会变革提供了新的视角。 Originated in the Second Women's Movement,intersectionality has recently become a new research paradigm in psychology. As a normative theory,intersectionality focuses on multiple marginalized identities or all identities,assuming that power is relational and social identities are socially constructed,and therefore values the non-additive but multiple intersecting effect and the use of multimethodology. Integrating intersectionality into psychology can substantially inform the theory and methods in psychology: Intersectional perspectives can improve psychologists' ability to theorize and empirically investigate the ways that social categories structure individual and group experiences,reveal the complexity of individual and group's life and mechanisms of power and social inequality,and identify the relationship between knowledge and power,therefore providing a new lens for contextualized understanding of individual and group's experiences and promoting methodological reform and social activism in psychology.
作者 郭爱妹
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期102-109,共8页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目"中产阶层化过程中女性社会空间建构研究"(12BSH027) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学重大基金项目"江苏老龄化社会与服务体系 公共政策研究"(2011ZDAXM016)阶段性研究成果
关键词 社会认同 交错性 交错性研究 研究范式 social identities intersectionaltiy intersectional studies research paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Anthias,F.,2012,“Intersectionality What?Social Divisions,Intersectionality and Levels of Analysis”,Ethnicities,vol.13,no.1,pp.3-19.
  • 2Bowleg,L.,2008,“When Black+Lesbian+Woman≠Black Lesbian Woman:The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research”,Sex Roles,vol.59,pp.312-325.
  • 3Brah,A.&A.Phoenix,2004,“Aren't I A Woman?Revisiting Intersectionality”,Journal of International Women's Studies,vol.5,no.3,pp.75-86.
  • 4Cho,S.K.,W.Crenshaw&L.McC all,2013,“Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies:Theory,Applications,and Praxis”,Signs,vol.38,no.4,pp.785-810.
  • 5Choo,H.Y.&M.M.Ferree,2010,“Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research:A Critical Analysis of Inclusions,Interactions,and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities”,Sociological Theory,vol.28,no.2,pp.129-149.
  • 6Cole,E.R.,2009,“Intersectionality and Research in Psychology”,American Psychologist,vol.64,no.3,2009,pp.170-180.
  • 7Collins,P.H.,2000,Black Feminist Thought:Knowledge,Consciousness,and the Politics of Empowerment,NY:Routledge.
  • 8Collins,P.H.,2012,“Social Inequality,Power and Politics:Intersectionality and American Pragmatism in Dialogue”,Journal of Speculative Philosophy,vol.26,no.2,pp.442-457.
  • 9Combahee River Collective,1977/1995,“Combahee River Collective Statement”,in B.Guy-Sheftall(ed.),Words of Fire:An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought,New York:New Press.
  • 10Crenshaw,K.,1989/1993,“Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex:A Black Feminist Politics”,in D.K.Weisbert(ed.),Feminist Legal Theory:Foundations,Philadelphia:Temple University Press.

同被引文献234

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部