期刊文献+

五大区重点产业发展战略环境评价有效性研究 被引量:2

Effectiveness Research on the SEA of Key Industries' Development in the Five-mega Regions.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,战略环境评价作为评价政府公共决策环境影响的有效工具日益受到决策层关注。有效性评价是评估战略环评程序及结果运用情况的重要手段,但当前国内外在战略环评有效性理论和实践方面的研究尚不成熟。本研究以五大区域重点产业发展战略环境评价为研究对象,通过问卷形式向58位相关领域专家和政府人员进行了咨询,在此基础上建立有效性研究指标体系,通过群组层次分析法计算权重,通过模糊数学综合评判法对五大区域重点产业发展战略环境评价的有效性进行定性定量分析,结果表明五大区战略环评综合有效性较好。希望能够为大区域战略环评有效性评价提供理论支持和实践经验。 In recent years, the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) as an effective tool for evaluating the environmental effect of the government's public policy-making has increasingly concerned by the decision- makers. Effectiveness assessment is an important mean to assess the process and the results of the SEA. But the current domestic and international research in the theory and practice of SEA effectiveness evaluation have not yet mature. This study selected SEA on the key industries" development in the five-mega regions as research object, and established index system of SEA effectiveness basic on consulting 58 relevant experts and government officials. The weighs of each index can be gained by the method of group analytic hierarchy process (Group-AHP). By means of fuzzy synthetic evaluation to qualitative and quantitative analyze the effectiveness of SEA on the key industries' development in the five-mega regions. The results showed that SEA in five-mega regions has a good overall effectiveness. Hope the paper will provide theoretical and practical experiences to support the large regional SEA effectiveness assessment.
出处 《未来与发展》 2015年第11期44-49,共6页 Future and Development
关键词 五大区域重点产业发展 战略环境评价 有效性研究 群组层次分析法 模糊综合评价法 key industries' development in the five-mega regions, SEA, effectiveness research, Group-AHP,Fuzzy synthetic evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1THERIVEL 1Z, WILSON E, THOMPSON S, et al. Strategic environmental assessment [M]. London: Earth Scan Publication Ltd, 1992.
  • 2Gibson P, B, Walker A. Assessing trade: an evaluation of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation" s analytical framework for assessing the environmental effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2001, 21(1):449-68.
  • 3Ortolano L, Jenkins B, Abracosa tk P. Speculations on When and Why EIA is Effective [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 1987, 7(4):285-292.
  • 4Fischer T B. The consideration of sustainability aspects in transport infrastructure related policies, plans and programmes: a comparative analysis ofNorth West England, Noord -Holland and Brandenburg-Berlin [J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1999, 42(2): 189-219.
  • 5Lawrence D P. Quality and effectiveness of environmental impact assessments: lessons and insights from ten assessments in CanadalJ], Project Appraisal, 1997, 12(4): 219-232.
  • 6IAIA Strategic Environmental Performance Criteria, IAIA Special Series No.l, International Association Assessment, 2002. Assessment Publication for Impact.
  • 7Commission of the European Communities. The application and effectiveness of the Directive on Strategic Environmental Assessment (Directive 2001/42/EC). 2009.
  • 8Noble B F. Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2009, 29(1): 66-75.
  • 9乔致奇.环境影响评价能力建设和政策[C]//中国环境影响评价国际研讨会论文集.青岛[出版社不详] ,1995.
  • 10李天威,于连生.EIA有效性及其行为因素初探[J].环境科学,1996,17:11-17.

二级参考文献32

共引文献72

同被引文献73

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部