试论我国刑事司法解释与主流刑法理论之冲突

Try to Talk about our Country's Criminal Judicial Interpretation and the Mainstream of the Criminal Law Theory of Conflict

刑事司法解释是"两高"在适用刑事法律规范的过程中,对刑事法律规范的具体应用问题所作的具有普遍司法效力的阐明,它对我国的刑事法律适用起着重要的指导作用。刑事司法解释与主流刑法理论之间的冲突集中表现在刑事司法解释所制造的大量"例外"规定上。而二者在这些"例外"规定上存在冲突的根源在于它们对罪刑法定原则遵守程度的差异。刑事司法解释制造这些"例外"规定则有违背罪刑法定原则的嫌疑。基于这种考虑,笔者欲从刑事司法解释制造的"例外"规定入手,从主流刑法理论对"例外"规定的不同看法的角度进一步剖析二者冲突问题的根源,力求从中发掘协调二者之间关系的有效途径。

Criminal judicial interpretation is ＂projects＂ in the process of applicable criminal law, the criminal law of the practical application of the universal justice and clarify it to our country criminal law plays an important role in guiding. Criminal judicial interpretation and the mainstream of the criminal law theory of the conflict between the concentrated expression in the criminal judicial interpretation made by a lot of ＂exception＂ rule. And both on these ＂exceptions＂ provisions conflict is rooted in their compliance with principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a degree of difference. Criminal judicial interpretation make the ＂exception＂ rule is contrary to the principle of a le- gally prescribed punishment. Based on this consideration, the author made from criminal judicial interpretation ＂exception＂ rule, further analyze the between them. from the mainstream theory of ＂exception＂ provisions of the criminal law different view Angle to root of the conflict, makes every effort to explore an effective way to coordinate the relationship