摘要
通说对于放任的故意和过于自信的区别存在逻辑上的错误,不利于保护法益,也不利于保障人权。过于自信过失仅限于两种情况:一是在具体的背景下,以一般人的视角进行观察,认为不会有任何危险的。二是行为人认识了构成犯罪事实发生的可能性,但为了被害人的利益不得不为之的。放任与过于自信的区别在于:行为人能否将他人的法益掌控在自己的手中。
Common theory makes a logical mistake in distinguishing between the indirect intention and the over-confident negligence, which is not conducive to the protection of legal interests and human rights. Over-confi-dent negligence should be limited to two situations：（1） Under a specific context, every ordinary person would a-gree that it doesn＇t exist any danger;（2） The offender is aware of the possibility of the occurrence of a crime, but for the benefit of the victims, he has to resort. So the difference between the indirect intention and the over-confi-dent negligence is whether or not the offender can keep others＇ legal interests under control.
出处
《福建警察学院学报》
2015年第4期8-14,共7页
Journal of Fujian Police College
关键词
逻辑
间接故意
过于自信
法益
logic
indirect intention
over-confident negligence
legal interests
