摘要
《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》第33条第1款中的"不正当利益"可以理解为建立在虚假的请求权基础事实之上的利益。"捏造事实"应当从结果意义上进行规范理解,既包括虚构事实,也包括隐瞒真相。至于"事实",从理论上应当理解为客观事实,但司法适用中应当以法院民事判决的结果为准。第2款使用的表述方式是理论上的折中路线,同时也具有预设前提不合理和法定刑设置严重失衡两个缺陷。立法机关对本条还应当作进一步的研究和修改。
According to the first section of article 33 in the Draft of Criminal Law Amendment,＂the illegitima-ted interests＂ can be interpreted as the interests based on the false claims. ＂Fabricated facts＂, including fabrica-ting and hiding facts, should be understood normatively from the results these facts lead to. As for the ＂facts＂, they should exist objectively in theory; however, in the judicial practice, they depend on the result of the civil judgments. And the second section, a compromise route in theory, has two defects：the unreasonable premises and the uncoordinated penalty. In conclusion, article 33 shall be deemed to further study and revision.
出处
《福建警察学院学报》
2015年第4期15-20,共6页
Journal of Fujian Police College
关键词
虚假诉讼
不正当利益
捏造事实
从重处罚
false lawsuit
illegitimated interests
fabricating facts
punish severely
