论盗窃罪中的数额认识错误

The Recognition Mistake of the Amount in Theft Crime

对数额的体系定位有客观处罚条件说和客观的构成要件要素说两种观点。相比之下,客观的构成要件要素说的处理结果更具刑法规范制度上的契合性与刑法理论语境的适应性。在此立场下,数额认识错误中包括消极的错误和抽象的对象认识错误。对于消极的错误,由于行为人没有认识到成立犯罪的数额,可阻却盗窃故意;对于抽象的对象认识错误,可在重合限度内成立相应的盗窃既遂或"数额较大"的未遂。天价案的出现一方面源于理论挖掘的深度不够,一方面在于陷入了"唯数额论"的误区。破除"唯数额论"不应局限于理念上的改变,还有待立法设计上的跟进。

There are two viewpoints on the systematical location for amount： the theory of the objective punishment condition and that of the objective constitutive element. In contrast,the result of the theory of the objective constitutive element shows more compatibility in standardized system of criminal law and more adaptability in the context of theory of criminal law. From this point,the recognition mistake of the amount includes negative error and abstract target error. As to negative error,it may prevent the larceny intent because of lacking of awareness of the amount required to establish crime.However,to an abstract target error,the larceny can be established in the coincident range or attempted theft of aggravated amount can be established. The reason for the emergence of the case of ＂ whopping price＂ lies in two aspects： the in-depth study of the criminal theory is far from enough and researchers have felt in the traps of the theory of ＂ only amount＂.The recognition of trying to break the theory of ＂ only amount＂ should not be confined to the alteration of ideas. And the improvement of legislative design is extremely urgent as well.