1Trinh QD,Sammon J,Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open rad- ical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sam- ple [J]. Eur Urol,2012,61(4):679-685.
3Abbou CC, Hozenk A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoseopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot[J]. J Urol, 2001,165 : 1964- 1966.
4Epstein JI, Allsbrook Jr WC, Amin MB, et al. The 2005 Inter- national Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005,29(9) :1228-1242.
1TRINH QD, SAMMON J, SUN M, et al. Perioperative out- comes of robot-assisted radical prostateetomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpa- tient sample[J]. Eur Urol, 2012,61(4) :679-685.
2PRUTHI RS, WALLEN EM. Current status of robotic prosta- tectomy., promises fulfilled[J]. J Urol, 2009, 181 (6)： 2420- 2421.
3HAN M, KIM C, MOZER P, et al. Tandem-robot assisted lap- aroscopic radical prostatectomy to improve the neurovascular bundle visualization: a feasibility study[J]. Urology, 2011,77 (2) :502-506.
5YU HY, HEVELONE ND, LIPSITZ SR, et al. Hospital vol- ume, utilization, costs and outcomes of robot-assisted laparo- scopic radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2012, 187(5): 1632- 1637.
6ASIMAKOPOULOS AD, CORONA MVE, GASTON R. Ro- bot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostateetomy with intrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles and preservation of the pubovesical complex: a step-by-step description of the technique [J]. J Endourol, 2012,26(12) :1578-1585.
7FICARRA V, NOVARA G, AHLERING TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012,62 (3) : 418-430.
8FICARRA V, NOVARA G, ROSEN RC, et al. Systematic re- view and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2012,62(3) :405-417.
9BOLENZC, FREEDLAND SJ, HOLLENBECK BK, et al. Costs of Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A System- atic Review. Eur Urol, 2012. doi: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2012. 08. 059[Epub ahead of print].
10TEWARI A, SOORIAKUMARAN p, BLOCH DA, et al. Posi- tive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of pri- mary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-ana[ysis comparing retropub/c, laparoscopic, and ro- botic prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012.62(1 ). 1-1.
