1Eleuterio Jr, Giraldo PC, Goncalves AK, et al. Prognostic makers of high-grade squamous intraepimelial lesions: the role of p16INK4a and high-risk human papillomavirus[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007,86 (1) : 94-98.
2Liao GD, Sellors JW, Sun HK, et al. P16INK4A immuno- histochemieal staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 : a prospective study in China[J]. Int J Cancer, 2014,134 (7): 1715-1724.
4Zhang G, Yang B, Abdul-Karim FW. P16 immunohisto- chemistry is useful in confirming high-grade squamous intra- epithelial lesions (HSIL) in women with negative HPV tes- ting[J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2015,34(2): 180-186.
5Koo YJ, Hahn HS, Lee IH, et al. Dual immunostaining of cervical cytology specimens with atypical squamous cells for p16/Ki-67 does not exclude the existence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion[J]. Virchows Arch, 2013,463 (5) :689-696.
6Kim NR, Lin Z, Kim KR, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and pl6INK4A methylation in squamous cell carcinoma and pre- cancerous lesions of the cervix uteri[J]. Korean Med Sci, 2005,20(4) :636-642.
7Gatta LB, Berenzi A, Balzarini P, et al, Diagnostic implica- tions of L1, p16, and Ki-67 Proteins and HPV DNA in low- grade cervical intraepitheliai neoplasia [J]. Int J Gyneeol Pathol, 2011, 30(6) : 597-604.
8Zhong P, Li J, Gu Y,et al. P16 and Ki-67 expression im- proves the diagnostic accuracy of cervical lesions but not pre- dict persistent high risk human papillomavirus infection with CINI[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015,8(3) : 2979-2986.
9Tabrizi SN, Tan SE, von Knebel Doeberitz C, et al. Evalua- tion of p16INK4a immunostaining for the detection of high- grade changes in cervical cytology[J]. Pathology, 2015,47 (4) :314-319.
