摘要
由对擅自提前开工工程应调查的两个问题引出其背后的四种质量行为,通过揭示"泛实体检测"的问题纠正了对检测报告无防伪校验码背后质量行为问题的辨识误区,从而间接证明了论点,接着阐述并论证了每种质量行为的调查和问题处理方法,最后得出使用该方法能促使相关企业和个人切实承担其法定责任的结论。
In this article,the writer tries to prove that investigating by law and letting the relevant company and personnel to further judge whether they’ve done their duties and then investigating what they’ve reaffirmed is the right way to supervise the construction quality behavior which is vulnerable to building without permission. Firstly,he extracts four types of quality behavior from two questions about project that is built without permission,which should be surveyed. In this course,he alters the recognition of the quality behavior problem behind the defect that testing report has no code against forgery by revealing the problem of ‘vast body test’. By this he proves the topic point indirectly. Then he expresses and proves the way of investigating and problem solving aimed to each quality behavior. Finally he concludes that using this way can make the relevant company and personnel shoulder their duties in law.
出处
《工程质量》
2015年第11期54-58,共5页
Construction Quality
关键词
擅自提前开工
监督
检测
building without permission
supervise
test