期刊文献+

IVUS结合FFR指导冠脉临界病变介入治疗的价值 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析冠脉内超声(intravascular ultrasound,IVUS)与血流储备分数(fractional flow reserve,FFR)检查在冠脉临界病变介入治疗中的应用价值。方法将63例冠状动脉造影为临界病变患者随机分为强化他汀药物治疗组、血运重建组和对照组,比较不良心血管事件的发生情况。结果血运重建组再发心绞痛1例;强化他汀药物治疗组中,出现急性心肌梗死1例,再发心绞痛2例;对照组中再发心绞痛2例。3组主要的不良心血管事件的发生率均较低。结论 FFR可作为冠状动脉临界病变是否需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗的重要临床依据,FFR>0.75,IVUS检查能够提示不稳定斑块,单纯药物治疗是安全的。
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2015年第31期4354-4355,共2页 The Medical Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Tobis J,Azarbal B, Slavin LAssessment of intermediate severitycoronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory [J].J Am Col] Cardiol, 2007,49 (8) : 839-848.
  • 2Kern M J, Samedy H.Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory [J].Joumal of the American College of Cardiology,2010,55( 3 ):173-185.
  • 3Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B, Peels K, et al.Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 1996,334 (26) : 1703-1708.
  • 4李勇,任法新,方毅民,杨军,刘少荣,王桂乐.临界血流储备分数指导中度冠状动脉病变治疗的临床价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(9):2704-2706. 被引量:9

二级参考文献13

  • 1Kern MJ,Lerman A,Bech JWet al.Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory:a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization,Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation . 2006
  • 2Kern MJ,,Samady H.Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2010
  • 3Dias CC,Mateus P,Bettencourt N,et al.Value of fractional flow reserve in the management of patients with moderate coronary stenosis. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia . 2004
  • 4Verna E,Lattanzio M,Ghiringhelli S,et al.Performing versus deferring coronary angioplasty based on functional evaluation of vessel stenosis by pressure measurements:a clinical outcome study. Cardiovascular Medicine . 2006
  • 5Jimenez-Navarro MF,Alonso-Briales J,Hernandez-Garcia JM,et al.Usefulness of fractional flow reserve in multivessel coronary artery disease with intermediate lesions. Journal of Interventional Cardiology . 2006
  • 6Lindstaedt M,Halilcavusogullari Y,Yazar A,et al.Clinical outcome following conservative vs revascularization therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements. Clinical Cardiology . 2010
  • 7P.A. Tonino,B. Bruyne,N.H. Pijls.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. The New England Journal of Medicine . 2009
  • 8Courtis J,Rodés Cabau J,Larose E,et al.Comparison of medicaltreatment and coronary revascularization in patients with moderatecoronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measure-ments. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions . 2008
  • 9Tani S,Watanabe 1,Kobari C,Matsumoto M,Miyazawa T,Iwamoto Y,et al.Mismatch between results of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR)measurements and myocardial perfusion SPECT for identification of the severity of ischemia:pitfall of FFR in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Japanese Heart Journal . 2004
  • 10Jeremias A,Whitboum RJ,Filardo SD,et al.Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve. American Heart Journal . 2000

共引文献8

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部