期刊文献+

检验危急值模拟评估病危患者预后的可行性研究

Feasibility study of test critical values on simulation evaluation of the prognosis of critically ill patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索用危急值来评估病危患者预后的方法和效果。方法采用类似诊断试验的统计评价方法,用危急值出现与否来评价病危患者的预后。结果用危急值的出现来评估病危患者的敏感度为61.44%,特异度为75.17%,误诊率为24.83%,漏诊率为38.56%。结论病危患者病情复杂,各种指标有着不同的临床意义,用危急值报告来估计病危患者的预后有一定的局限性,临床医护应当根据患者病情的变化来正确评估,适时调整治疗方案;检验工作人员应当严格执行危急值报告制度,保持与临床良好的沟通机制。 ObjectiveTo investigate the methods and measures that assess the prognosis of critically ill patients by test critical values.MethodsAll values were analyzed with statistics analysis method like diagnostic test. The prognoses of critically ill patients were evaluated with test critical values.ResultsThe sensitivity of the assessment that can be a guide to critically ill patients with critical values is 61.44%,and the specificity is 75.17%,Correspondingly,the false positive rate is 24.83%,and the false negative rate is 38.56%.ConclusionSince the complexities of critically ill patient's condition,various indexes demonstrate different clinical significance. There was limitation to some extent of evaluation the prognosis of critically ill patients by the critical values reports. Clinical health care workers should make the right assessment depending on the variation of the patient's condition and adjust the treatment proposal in time. Inspection staff should execute the critical values report system strictly and keep a good communication mechanism with the clinical staffs.
作者 路卯
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2015年第33期4612-4614,共3页 The Medical Forum
关键词 病危患者 预后评估 危急值 应用探讨 Critically ill patients Prognosis Critical values Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1方德友,高枫.陕西省不同地区人口幽门螺杆菌调查比较分析[J].延安大学学报(医学科学版),2009,7(2):6-8. 被引量:4
  • 2王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1414
  • 3刘晓红.慢性幽门螺杆菌感染与冠心病发病及其危险因素的关系[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2005,19(12):881-883. 被引量:16
  • 4Lundberg G D. When to panic over abnormal values[J]. MLOMed Lab Obs, 1972(4): 47-54.
  • 5George D, Lundberg G D. Critical (panic) value notification: an estab- lished laboratory practice policy (parameter)[J]. JAMA, 1990, 263(5): 709.
  • 6Piva E, SciacoveIli L, Laposata M, et ol. Assessment of critical values policies in ItMian institutions: comparison with the US situation [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2010, 48: 461-468.
  • 7Anand S Dighe, Arjun Rao, Amanda B Coakley, et al. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006. 125: 758-764.
  • 8Gong Y, Adeli K. A national survey on pediatric critical values used in clinical laboratories across Canada[J]. Clin Biochem, 2009, 42: 1610-1615.
  • 9Howanitz P J, Steindel S J, Heard N V. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2002, 126: 663- 669.
  • 10Wagar E A, Friedberg R C, Souers R, et al. Critical values compari- son: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes survey of 163 clin- ical laboratories[J]. Ah Pathol Lab Med, 2007, 131: 1769-1775.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部