期刊文献+

论私营海上武装保安抗击海盗使用武力的权源与标准

Basis and Standard of Privately Contracted Armed Security Guards' Use of Force Against Pirates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着海盗行为的猖獗,航运公司使用私营海上武装保安防卫海盗袭击越来越普遍。国际习惯法和各国国内法都承认,个体在遭受不法攻击时可以使用武力自卫。但国际海洋法中缺乏对个体在海上使用武力自卫的规定,且各国对自卫的一般规定和针对私营海上武装保安使用武力自卫的进一步指南各有不同,难于对商船上私营海上武装保安使用武力自卫提供明确和可预见性的法律规则指引。因此,为更好地利用这种保护航运业的有效措施,使用武力自卫的规则应当在国际范围内实现统一。 With the rampant piracy,employing privately armed security guards on board against pirates’ attack has become more and more popular with shipping companies.Consequently,the basis of armed security guards’ use of force to combat pirates has been at issue.When an individual is confronted with an illegal attack,he or she is entitled to use force for self-defense,which is recognized by the customary international law and national laws.However,regarding the use of force for self-defense,there are no specific provisions in the maritime international law and there exist various versions of guidelines in the national laws,which make it difficult to provide privately armed security guards on board with clear and predictable laws and regulations in the use of force for self-defense.Therefore,in order to make better use of these effective measures to protect the shipping industry,the rules of force use for self-defense should achieve unity in the international level.
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期625-630,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 辽宁省高校创新团队支持计划资助项目(WT2012002)
关键词 私营海上武装保安 海盗行为 自卫 privately contracted armed security guard piracy self-defense
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Oceans Beyond Piracy. The State of Maritime Piracy 2014[EB/OL]. [2015 - 06 - 08]. http; //oceansbeyondpiracy.org/ sites/default/files/attachments/StateofMaritimePiracy2014. pdf.
  • 2Isenberg D. The Rise of Private Maritime SecurityCompanies[EB/OL]. (2012 - 05 - 29) [2015 - 06 - 10].http: // www. huffingtonpost. com/david - isenberg/private-military-contractors_b_ 1548523. html.
  • 3Priddy A, Casey-Maslen S. Counter-piracy Operations byPrivate Maritime Security Contractors: Key Legal Issuesand Challenges [ J ]. Journal of International CriminalJustice, 2012,10:843.
  • 4Bevilacqua G. Counter Piracy Armed Services,the ItalianSystem and the Search for Clarity on the Use of Force at22: 52.
  • 5Dutton Y M. Gunslingers on the High Seas ? A Call forRegulation [ J ]. Duke Journal Comparative andInternational Law, 2013 .24 : 110 - 111.
  • 6Richard T T. Reconsidering the Letter of Marque:Utilizing Private Security Providers Against Piracy [J].Public Contract Law Journal, 2010 ,39(3) :462.
  • 7Fletcher G P. A Crime of Self-defense: Bernhard Goetzand the Law on Trial[M]. 2ed. Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1990 : 18.
  • 8Kopel D B, Gallant P, Eisen J D. The Human Right ofSelf-defense [J]. Brigham Young University Journal ofPublic Law, 2007,22:43.
  • 9Symmons C R. Embarking Vessel Protection Detachmentsand Private Armed Guards on Board Commercial Vessels:International Legal Consequences and Problems Under theLaw of the Sea[J]. Military Law and the Law of WarReview, 2012,51 (1) :36.
  • 10Pizor B E. Lending an “Invisible Hand” to the Navy:Armed Guards as a Free Market Assistance to DefeatingPiracy[J]. Case Western Reserve University's Journal ofInternational Law, 2012 ,45-558 - 559.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部