期刊文献+

胰腺恶性肿瘤淋巴结清扫的研究进展

Research progresses of extended lymphadenectomy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 淋巴转移分级是胰腺恶性肿瘤切除预后分析的最重要的影响因素之一,具有重要临床意义。目前,对于胰十二指肠切除术的淋巴结清扫范围仍存在争议。通过对胰十二指肠切除手术中淋巴结清扫范围的循证医学证据的研究发现,扩大淋巴结清扫并没有为胰头癌患者的术后生存带来更多益处。根据胰腺肿瘤复发转移的性质及患者术后生存质量两方面扩大清扫都不具有优势。该文就胰腺恶性肿瘤手术的规范化治疗作一综述。 Lymph node metastasis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are the most important factors for analyzing the prognosis of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and have important clinical significance.There has been debated on the extent of lymphadenectomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy.Results of evidence based medicine researches show that extended lymphadenectomy has little positive effect on the post-operative survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.No studies support the extended lymphadenectomy according to recurrence and metastasis of pancreatic cancer and the survival quality of patients.This paper reviews the standardized surgical treatment of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期1749-1752,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
关键词 胰腺恶性肿瘤 标准根治 扩大淋巴结清扫 胰十二指肠切除术 pancreatic adenocarcinoma standard lymphadenectomy extended lymphadenectomy pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure[ J]. Surgery, 2012, 152 (3 Suppl 1 ) : S43 - S49.
  • 2Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadeneetomy associated with pancreatoduodeneetomy in the surgical treatment of adenocareinoma of the head of the pancreas : a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group[J]. Ann Surg, 1998, 228(4) : 508 -517.
  • 3Yeo C J, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Panereaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for peri- ampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome [J].Ann Surg, 1999, 229 ( 5 ) : 613 - 622.
  • 4Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, et al. Standard versus extended ]ymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial[ J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2012, 19(3) : 230 -241.
  • 5Jang JY, Kang M J, Heo JS, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer [J].Ann Surg, 2014, 259(4) : 656 -664.
  • 6Valsangkar NP, Bush DM, Michaelson JS, et al. N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node nmnber on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(2) : 257 -266.
  • 7Van den Broeck A, Sergeant G, Ectors N, et al. Patterns of recur-renee after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J]. EurJSurgOncol, 2009, 35(6): 600 -604.
  • 8Cubilla AL, Fortner J, Fitzgerald PJ. Lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas area[ J]. Cancer, 1978, 41 (3): 880 -887.
  • 9Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, et al. Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion[J]. Surgery, 1995, 117(6) : 616 -623.
  • 10Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Sasaki Y, et al. Practical grouping ofpositive lymph nodes in pancreatic head cancer treated by an extended pancreatectomy[ J ]. Surgery, 1997, 121 (3) : 244 - 249.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部