禁止篡夺公司机会的司法裁量路径探索

Judicial Discretion on Applying Corporate Doctrine

虽然我国的新《公司法》颁布九年了,但有关公司机会案例的种类仍然较少,实践经验不足。对义务主体正面列举的要求限制了该规则适用范围的扩大。另外,值得警惕的是,司法实践中出现了以民法责任构成要件不足为借口来推翻篡夺公司机会的事实的审判思维。对于禁止篡夺公司机会的司法裁量应当分成两步:首先判断该机会是否属于公司,以及董事或者高管是否有篡夺行为存在。如果确定,接着就要认定董事或者高管利用该机会获得的利益与公司损失之间的关系,并判定具体的损害赔偿金额,根据公司法上的归入权来救济被侵害的公司。

It has been nine years since the new company law was released in 2006. However, the application of corporate doctrine in China is still lack of practical experience. The scope of this doctrine limits its application to people other than directors. Also, it should be on the alert that there may be a trend in practice to overrule the fact of capturing corporate opportunity by implying the components of civil liabilities. To apply the corporate doctrine, the court shall first find whether or not such opportunity belongs to the corporate and if the director or the senior executive has usurped such corporate opportunity, then the court shall indemnify the corporate in the same amount that such corporate opportunity has benefited the director or the senior.