快速血糖仪应用于急诊检验血糖的价值分析

The Value of Rapid Blood Glucose Meter in the Examination of Blood Glucose in the Emergency department

目的探讨分析快速血糖仪在急诊检验血糖中的应用价值。方法随机选取2014年7月—2015年7月间,于佛山市第一人民医院急诊科行快速血糖仪和常规生化仪检验血糖的90例患者参与此次研究。根据患者的临床资料,对两种检查方法的效果进行比较分析,并对快速血糖仪应用于急诊检验血糖的价值进行回顾性分析。结果经观察比较,快速血糖仪检查的90例患者的平均血糖值为(8.12±2.13)mmol/L,常规生化仪检验的90例患者的平均血糖值为(7.56±2.63)mmol/L,两种检查方法的结果比较无明显差异,无统计学意义(P>0.05);快速血糖仪检查的90例患者的平均检测用时为(4.12±1.13)min,常规生化仪检验的90例患者的平均检测用时为(34.12±10.13)min,快速血糖仪检查方法明显较常规生化仪检验方法用时短,有明显差异,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论快速血糖仪应用于急诊检验血糖的价值是确切可靠的。不仅较常规生化仪检验血糖用时更短,而且两种检查方法的检测结果也无明显差异,是一种安全、简便的诊断手段,对于急诊检验血糖具有十分重要的意义,受到了患者家属的普遍好评,值得在临床中大力推广。

Objective To investigate the value of rapid blood glucose meter in the emergency test of blood glucose. Methods 90 cases in the emergency department of our hospital from July 2014 to July2015 were randomly collected. The blood glucose were detected by rapid blood glucose meter and conventional biochemical analyzer test. According to the clinical data,the effect of the two methods was compared and analyzed, and the value of rapid blood glucose meter for the emergency test were evalued. Results The average blood glucose level of 90 patients was( 8. 12 + 2. 13) mmol / L by rapid blood glucose meter,while( 7. 56 + 2. 63) mmol / L by conventional biochemical analyzer test. There was no obvious difference between the two methods( P > 0. 05). The average detection was( 4. 12 ± 1. 13)min by rapid blood glucose meter, while( 34. 12 + 10. 13) min by conventional biochemical analyzer. The difference was significantly( P < 0. 05). Conclusion The rapid blood glucose meter is accurate and reliable in the emergency test of blood sugar. Compared with the conventional biochemical analyzer,it is shorter,and the test results of the two methods were not significantly different. It is a safe and simple method of diagnosis. It is very important for the emergency test of blood glucose and worth to be popularized in clinic.