期刊文献+

国际知名考试质量与公平性标准的比较研究与启示 被引量:5

A Comparative Study on the Assessment Standards for Quality and Fairness of Internationally Well-Known Examinations and Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 托福考试、雅思考试、美国研究生入学考试和美国大学入学考试等国际知名考试之所以得到世界公认,是因其完善的考试质量与公平性标准为其提供质量和公平保障。这些国际知名考试质量标准既注重测试公平,又有测试质量监控机制;提倡信息公开,维护考生权利。而我国现有的考试标准仅关注测试链中某个单一环节的管理,缺乏测试公平性原则和人性化服务;考试信息不够充分、透明,易造成测试结果的误读误用。保证我国教育考试的科学与公平,需要尽快由国家主导制定统一的测试质量与公平性标准;借鉴国际成熟经验,考虑中国国情,"以人为本",增加考试的透明度,保障考试各利益方的权益;对测试开发、命题、实施、成绩解释和使用等诸多环节进行规范和检测,实现以法治考。 The reason-TOEFL,IELTS,ACT and GRE are acknowledged by the world is that these international well-known examinations strictly follow a set of assessment standards for quality and fairness. These standards put testing ethics and quality control at equal measures. They promote test information transparency and protect the right of tests-tak- ers and other stakeholders. In contrast, the present test standards in China, lacking rules protecting fairness and rights of test-takers, only focus on the management of one separate part of the entire test development circle, which results in test information insufficiency as well as misinterpretation and misuse of test results. Therefore, it is imperative to develop na- tional assessment standards for quality and fairness in China. Drawing references from international widely-used assess- ment standards, we also need to consider the specific circumstances of teaching and testing in China. Developing assess- ment standards will help increase test quality, fairness and transparency, and protect the rights of test stakeholders. Setting standards to regulate test development, test administration and test use is a significant step towards administering tests by law.
作者 程蒙蒙
机构地区 教育部考试中心
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第11期21-25,共5页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 国际知名考试 质量标准 公平性标准 标准制定 测试质量 internationally well-known examination standard for quality standard for fairness standard setting testing quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1杨惠中,桂诗春.语言测试的社会学思考[J].现代外语,2007,30(4):368-374. 被引量:141
  • 2国务院.国务院关于深化考试招生制度改革的实施意见[EB/0L].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-09/04/content9065.htm.2014-9-3.
  • 3American Educational Research Association ,American Psycho- logical Association, National Council on Measurement in Edu- cation. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [M]. Washington D.C.:American Educational Research Asso- ciation, 1955,1999,2014.
  • 4ETS. ETS Standards for Quality and Fairness[EB/OL3.https://www.ets.org/s/aboul/pdf/standards.pdf. 2001.
  • 5ALTE. Code of Practice~EB/OL~.http://www.alte.org/attachments /files/code_practice_eng.pdf. 2010.
  • 6ALTE. Principles of Good Practice for ALTE Examinations [ EB/O L ].http://www.ahe.org/attachments/files/good practice.pdf. 2007.
  • 7ILTA.Code of Ethics[EB/OL]. http://iltaonhne.com/images/pdfs/ ilta_code.pdt. 2000.
  • 8ILTA. Guidelines for Praetiee [EB/OL].httpiltihaonline,eom/im- ages/pdfs/ilta_guidelines.pdf. 2007.
  • 9ETSI Who we are[EB/OL].http://www.ets.org/about/whoL 2015.
  • 10Bachman,L.F.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Baker, D. 1989. Language Testing: A Critical Survey and Practical Guide [M]. Edward Arnold.
  • 2Canale, M. & M. Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing [J]. Applied Linguistics 1,1: 1-47.
  • 3Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Language Learning and Teaching [M]. Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Cumming, A. & R. Berwick. (eds.). 1995. Validation in language testing [A]. Modern Languages in Practice[C].
  • 5Davis, A. 1990. Principles of Language Testing[M]. Blackwell Publishers.
  • 6Henning, G. 1987. A Guide of Language Testing: Development Evaluation Research [M]. Newbury House Publishers.
  • 7Hughes, A. & P. Porter. 1987. Current Developments in Language Testing [M]. Academic Press Inc.
  • 8ILTA. Code of Ethics for ILTA (Adopted at the annual meeting of ILTA held in Vancouver, March 2000). http://www.iltaonline.com.
  • 9Shohamy, E. 2004, Assessment in multicultural societies: Applying democratic principles and practices to language testing[A]. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds.). Critical Padagogies and Language Learning [C]. Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Spolsky, B. 1995. Measured Words [M]. Oxford University Press.

共引文献140

同被引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部