期刊文献+

45岁以下肾细胞癌TFE3表达的临床及预后分析 被引量:3

TFE3-positive renal cell carcinoma in patients under the age of 45:a clinical and prognostic analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性比较分析45岁以下TFE3阳性肾细胞癌和TFE3阴性肾细胞癌患者的临床病理特征与预后情况。方法回顾2008年1月至2014年1月我院收治的57例45岁以下肾癌患者的临床资料,依据原有病理结果及TFE3免疫组化分析确定TFE3阳性肾癌、TFE3阴性肾癌,并对两组的临床病理学资料和预后情况进行比较分析。结果 TFE3阳性肾癌和TFE3阴性肾癌分别为21例和36例。TFE3阳性肾癌具有较明显的组织病理学特征,TFE3细胞核弥漫性表达;TFE3阳性肾癌中位年龄27岁,明显低于TFE3阴性肾癌41岁(P<0.001);TFE3阳性肾癌男女性别比(9∶12),与TFE3阴性肾癌男女性别比(25∶11)达到统计学差异(P=0.048);TFE3阳性肾癌Furhman分级1级占0%、2级占57.1%、3级占14.2%、4级占14.2%,TFE3阴性肾癌Furhman分级1级占27.8%、2级占55.6%、3级占8.3%、4级占8.3%,TFE3阳性肾癌组织学分级更高(P=0.005)。两组间肿瘤大小、位置、临床症状、手术方式、临床分期、5年生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与TFE3阴性肾癌相比,TFE3阳性肾癌发病年龄更低,多见于女性,组织学恶性度更高,但中期随访生存期无显著差异。 Objective To compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between TFE3-positive and TFE3-negative renal cell carcinoma in patients under 45 years of age. Methods Clinical data of 57 patients with renal cell carcinoma treated during Jan. 2008 and Jan. 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into TFE3-positive group (n = 21) and TFE3-negtive group (n = 36) based on the original pathological data and TFE3 immunohistochemical analysis. The cilnicopathological characteristics and survival rate of the two groups were compared. Results TFE3-positive renal carcinoma was found to have more specific histopathological features, with diffused expression of TFE3 in nuclear. Compared with TFE3-negative group, TFE3-positive group were significantly younger (26.4 ± 10.9) vs. (37.7 ± 7.3) years, P 〈 0. 001) and had lower male-female ratio (9 : 12 vs. 25 : 11, P=0. 048). The Furhman grade of TFE3-positive group was 0% in grade 1, 27.8% in grade 2, 14.2% in grade 3 and 14.2% in grade 4. The Furhman grade of TFE3-negative group was 27.8% in grade 1, 55.6% in grade 2, 8.3% in grade 3, 14.2% in grade 4. TFE3-positive group had a higher histological grade (P= 0. 005). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in tumor size, tumor location, clinical symptoms, surgical procedure, clinical stages and 5-year survival rate (P〉0.05). Conclusion Compared to TFE3-negative renal carcinoma, TFE3-positive renal carcinoma shows earlier average age of onset, higher female incidence rate and histological grade.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2015年第11期779-783,共5页 Journal of Modern Urology
基金 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20131281) 国家自然科学基金(21377052)
关键词 肾癌 Xp11.2 TFE3 预后 renal carcinoma XP11.2 TFE3 prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1ARGANI P, HAWKINS A, GRIFFIN CA, et al. A distinctive pediatric renal neoplasm characterized by epitheliod morphology, basement membrane production, focal HMB45 immunoreactivity andt(6ll) (p21. 1q12) chromosome translocation[J]. Am J Pathol, 2001,158 (6) : 2089-2096.
  • 2LOPEZ-BELTRAN A, SCARPEI.LI M, MONTIRONI R, et al. 2014 WHO classification of the renal of the adults[J]. Eur Uroi,2006,49(5) 798-805.
  • 3ARGANI P, LAL P, HUTCHINSON B, et al. Aberrant nucle- ar immunoreaetivity for TFE3 in neoplasms with TFE3 gene fu- sions: a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical assay[J]. Am J Surg Pathol,2003,27(6) 750-761.
  • 4KOMAI Y, FUJIWARA M, FUJII Y, et al. Adult Xpll trans- location renal cell carcinoma diagnosed by eytogenetics and im- munohistochemistry[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2009,15 (4) .. 1170 - 1176.
  • 5ARGANI P, OLGAC S, TICKOO SK, et al. Xpll transloca- tion renal cell carcinoma in adults: expanded clinical, pathologi- cal and genetic spectrum[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2007,31 (8) , 1149-1160.
  • 6SUKOV WR, HODGE JC, LOHSE CM, et al. TFE3 rear- rangements in adult renal cell carcinoma clinical and pathologic features with outcome in a large series of consecutively treated patients[J]. Am J Surg Pathol,2012,36(5) :663-670.
  • 7KLATTE T, STREUBEL B, WRBA F, et al. Renal cell carci- noma associated with transcription {actor E3 expression and Xpll. 2 Translocation[J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2012,137(5) ..761- 768.
  • 8RAIS-BAHRAMI S, DRABICK J, DE MARZO A, et al. Xpll translocation renall cell carcinoma: delayed but massive and letal metastases of a chemotherapy-associated secondary malignancy [J]. Urology,2007,70(1): 1783-1786.
  • 9TSUDA M, DAVIS IJ, ARGANI P, et al. TFE3 fusions acti- vate MET signaling by transcriptional up-regulation, defining another class of tumors as candidates for therapeutic MET inhi- bition[J]. Cancer Res,2007,67(3) :919-929.
  • 10饶秋,周晓军,吴波,马恒辉,周航波,刘晓红,陈洁宇.Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌的病理特征与临床分析[J].中华病理学杂志,2007,36(4):244-246. 被引量:36

二级参考文献17

  • 1Eble JN, Santer G, Epstein JI, et al. World Health Organization classification of tnmonrs. Pathology and genetics tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon:IARC Press, 2004:23-42.
  • 2Argani P, Lal P, Hutchinson B, et al. Aberrant nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3 in neoplasms with TFE3 gene fusions : a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical assay. Am J Surg Pathol,2003,27 (6) : 750-761.
  • 3Argani P, Antonescu CR, Couturier J, et al. PRCC-TFE3 renal carcinomas: morphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural,and molecular analysis of an entity associated with the t ( X; 1 )(p11.2;q21). Am J Surg Pathol,2002, 26(12) : 1553-1566.
  • 4Argani P, Antonescu CR, lllei PB, et al. Primary renal neoplasms with the ASPL-TFE3 gene fusion of alveolar soft part sarcoma:a distinctive tumor entity previously included among renal cell carcinomas of children and adolescents. Am J Pathol, 2001, 159( 1 ) : 179-192.
  • 5Bruder E,Passera O, Harms D, et al. Morphologic and molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma in children and young adults. Am J Surg Pathol, 2004, 28(9) :1117-1132.
  • 6Careao MD, Taylor GP, Greenberg ML, et al. Renal-cell carcinoma in children: a different disorder from its adult counterpart? Mad Pedlatr Oncol, 1998,31 (3) :153-158.
  • 7Lopez-Beltran A,Scarpelli M,Montironi R. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults[J].{H}EUROPEAN UROLOGY,2006,(5):798-805.
  • 8Argani P,Lal P,Hutchinson B. Aberrant nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3 in neoplasms with TFE3 gene fusions:a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical assay[J].{H}American Journal of Surgical Pathology,2003,(6):750-761.
  • 9Kuroda N,Mikami S,Pan CC. Review of renal carcinoma associated with Xp1 1.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions with focus on pathobiological aspect[J].{H}Histology and Histopathology,2012,(2):133-140.
  • 10Green WM,Yonescu R,Morsberger L. Utilization of a TFE3 Break-apart FISH Assay in a Renal Tumor Consultation Service[J].{H}American Journal of Surgical Pathology,2013,(8):1150-1163.

共引文献49

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部