摘要
从"散隶""飞白"相互关系入手,理清"飞白草"之概念,阐述了蔡襄与"飞白草"、《陶生帖》与"飞白草"、"散笔"与"飞白"等诸多问题及其相互联系,提出"飞白草"个性艺术特征、蔡襄复兴"飞白草"的缘由以及"飞白草"的走向的理论见解,同时对"飞白草"与"飞白书"之"飞"同中存异的艺术特征以及"飞白草"非蔡襄所始创的观点进行了论述。
From the angle of the relation between " Sanli" and " Feibai" , the author clarified the concept of "Feibaicao" and expounded the problems and relationship between Cai Xiang and " Feibaicao" , "Tao Sheng Copybook" and "Feibaicao" , " Sanbi" and " Feibai". He put forward the special characteristics of " Feibaicao" , the reason for Cai Xiang's revival of " Feibaicao" and the theoretical insights into the development tendency of " Feibaicao ". At the same time, he discussed the artistic features of the " flying form" in " Feibaicao" and " Feibai " . He concluded that Cai Xiang had not created " Feibaicao" .
出处
《美育学刊》
2015年第6期73-79,共7页
Journal of Aesthetic Education
关键词
散笔
散草
飞白草
蔡襄
Sanbi
Sancao
Feibaicao
Cai Xiang