期刊文献+

阴道镜指引下多点活检遗漏子宫颈浸润癌14例临床分析 被引量:4

Clinical analysis of 14 invasive cervical carcinoma missed in colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过分析阴道镜指引下多点活检(CDB)遗漏子宫颈浸润癌患者的资料,探讨阴道镜活检后患者的管理模式。方法 645例CDB病理诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2及以上病变(CIN2+)患者行子宫颈锥切术,对比锥切术前后的病理结果及14例遗漏的子宫颈浸润癌患者的年龄、筛查结果、阴道镜诊断、病变范围及是否向颈管内延伸等临床资料。结果 CDB病理诊断CIN2+的敏感度为95.0%,特异度为46.2%,子宫颈锥切术前后CIN2/3病理诊断的一致性为71.4%(450/630),宫颈浸润癌遗漏率为2.2%(14/630)。14例遗漏子宫颈浸润癌患者的平均年龄为(43.4±8.7)岁,其中10例筛查结果为高级别病变,11例HPV高危亚型感染(10例为HPV16),12例阴道镜诊断为HSIL+,9例病变范围超过子宫颈面积的50%,13例CDB病理结果为CIN3,10例宫颈锥切术后病理结果提示切缘不净。结论阴道镜指引下多点活检是诊断CIN2/3的一种简单而有效的方法,但可遗漏少部分子宫颈浸润癌。对于病理诊断CIN2/3者建议行子宫颈锥切术进一步诊断及治疗。 Objective To analyze the data of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma that were missed in colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy (CDB) and summarize management model after colposcopy biopsy. Methods 645 cases who were diagnosed as CIN2 and higher level lesions (CIN2+) with CDB underwent cervical conization surgery. We compared pathology results before and after conization, analyzed and summarized the clinical data of 14 invasive cervical cancer cases missed under the guidance of colposcopy biopsy, including patients age, screening results, colposcopy diagnosis, extent of disease, and whether to extend into the cervical canals. Results The sensitivity of CDB pathological diagnosis of CIN2+ was 95.0% and the specificity was 46.2%, the pathological diagnosis consistency before and after cervical conization for CIN2/3 was 71.4% (450/630), the miss rate of invasive cervical carcinoma missed was 2.2% ( 14/630). The average age of these patients was (43.4-+ 8.7) years old, l0 cases were screened for high levels of abnormal cytology results, 11 cases were infected with high-risk HPV subtypes, of which 10 cases for subtype HPV16 infection, 12 cases were diagnosed with colposcopy for HSIL+, 9 patients with the lesion area more than 50% of the cervical areas, 13 patients' CDB pathology results were CIN3, l0 cases who with positive margin after conization surgery. Conclusions CDB is a simple and effective diagnosis method for CIN2/3, but may miss 2.2% of invasive cervical carcinoma. It suggested that cervical conization surgery is necessary for further diagnosis and treatment with regard to CIN2/3 with CDB.
出处 《中国妇产科临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期490-493,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 子宫颈锥切术 阴道镜指引下活检 子宫颈上皮内瘤变 管理模式 cervical conization colposcopic biopsy cervical intraepithelial neoplasia management model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Rogers L, Siu SS, Luesley D, et al. Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer. CochraneDatabase SystRev, 2012, 5: CD007583.
  • 2吕卫国,沈源明,叶枫,陈怀增,谢幸.阴道镜直视下活检诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变准确性的评价[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(5):303-306. 被引量:107
  • 3Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M, et al. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch GynecolObstet, 2012, 286: 1549-1954.
  • 4Witt BL, Factor RE, Jarboe EA, et al. Negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy finding following a biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: frequency and clinical significance. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2012, 136: 1259- 1261.
  • 5Stoler MH, Vichnin MD, Ferenczy A, et al. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials. Int J Cancer, 20l 1, 128 : 1354-1362.
  • 6Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 203: 321.el-6.
  • 7Mandic A, Knezevic-Usaj S, Nincic D, et al. Comparsion the histopathological findings after cervical biopsy and excisional procedures. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 2013, 56: 19- 22.
  • 8Diedrich JT, Felix JC, Lonky NM. Do colposcopically directed biopsy and endocervical curettage serve to induce regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2014, 18: 322-325.
  • 9Dalla Palma P, Giorgi Rossi P, Collina G, et al. The reproducibility of CIN diagnoses among different pathologists: data from histology reviews from a multicenter randomized study. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 132.- 125-132.
  • 10Castle PE, Stoler MH, Solomon D, et al. The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report. Am J Clin Pathol, 2007, 127: 805-815.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Fambrini M, Penna C, Fallani MG, et al. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of biopsy. Inter J Gynecol Obstet,2003,82:219-220.
  • 2Barker B, Gareia F, Lozevski J, et al. The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncolk,2001,82 :22-26.
  • 3Massad LS, Halperin CJ, Bitterman P. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision. Gynecol Oncol, 1996,60:400-403.
  • 4Wright TC, Cox T, Massad LS, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003,189:295 -304.
  • 5Costa S, Nuzzo MD, Rubino A, et al. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix.Gynecol Oncol,2003 ,90 :57-63.
  • 6Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 1993,12 : 186-192.
  • 7Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL triage study. JAMA,2001,285 : 1500-1505.
  • 8Martin eM, O'LearyJ J. Histology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the role of biomarkers. Best Pract Res Clin Ob- stet Gynaecol , 2011, 25: 605 - 615.
  • 9Moscick AB, Ma y, Wibbelsman C, et al. Rate of and risks for regression of CIN2 in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol , 2010, 116: 1373 -1380.
  • 10Heinonen A, Gissler M, Riska A, et al. Loop electrosurgi?cal excision procedure and the risk for preterm delivery. Ob?stet Gynecol, 2013, 121: 1063 - 1068.

共引文献112

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部