期刊文献+

Linear-fitting-based similarity coefficient map for tissue dissimilarity analysis in T2^*-w magnetic resonance imaging

Linear-fitting-based similarity coefficient map for tissue dissimilarity analysis in T2^*-w magnetic resonance imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Similarity coefficient mapping(SCM) aims to improve the morphological evaluation of T*2weighted magnetic resonance imaging(T*2-w MRI). However, how to interpret the generated SCM map is still pending. Moreover, is it probable to extract tissue dissimilarity messages based on the theory behind SCM? The primary purpose of this paper is to address these two questions. First, the theory of SCM was interpreted from the perspective of linear fitting. Then, a term was embedded for tissue dissimilarity information. Finally, our method was validated with sixteen human brain image series from multiecho T*2-w MRI. Generated maps were investigated from signal-to-noise ratio(SNR) and perceived visual quality, and then interpreted from intra- and inter-tissue intensity. Experimental results show that both perceptibility of anatomical structures and tissue contrast are improved. More importantly, tissue similarity or dissimilarity can be quantified and cross-validated from pixel intensity analysis. This method benefits image enhancement, tissue classification, malformation detection and morphological evaluation. Similarity coefficient mapping(SCM) aims to improve the morphological evaluation of T*2weighted magnetic resonance imaging(T*2-w MRI). However, how to interpret the generated SCM map is still pending. Moreover, is it probable to extract tissue dissimilarity messages based on the theory behind SCM? The primary purpose of this paper is to address these two questions. First, the theory of SCM was interpreted from the perspective of linear fitting. Then, a term was embedded for tissue dissimilarity information. Finally, our method was validated with sixteen human brain image series from multiecho T*2-w MRI. Generated maps were investigated from signal-to-noise ratio(SNR) and perceived visual quality, and then interpreted from intra- and inter-tissue intensity. Experimental results show that both perceptibility of anatomical structures and tissue contrast are improved. More importantly, tissue similarity or dissimilarity can be quantified and cross-validated from pixel intensity analysis. This method benefits image enhancement, tissue classification, malformation detection and morphological evaluation.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第12期610-615,共6页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 Project supported in part by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(Grant Nos.2015AA043203 and 2012AA02A604) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.81171402 61471349 and 81501463) the Innovative Research Team Program of Guangdong Province,China(Grant No.2011S013) the Science and Technological Program for Higher Education,Science and Research and Health Care Institutions of Guangdong Province China(Grant No.2011108101001) the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,China(Grant No.2014A030310360) the Fundamental Research Program of Shenzhen City,China(Grant No.JCYJ20140417113430639) Beijing Center for Mathematics and Information Interdisciplinary Sciences,China
关键词 T*2-w magnetic resonance imaging similarity coefficient map linear fitting tissue dissimilarity T*2-w magnetic resonance imaging,similarity coefficient map,linear fitting,tissue dissimilarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Lucas-Quesada F A, Sinha U and Sinha S 1996 Magn. Reson. Imaging 6 753.
  • 2Wiart M, Rognin N, Berthezene Y, Nighoghossian N, Froment J C and Baskurt A 2001 Magn. Reson. Med. 45 261.
  • 3Rogowska J, Preston K Jr, Hunter G J, Hamberg L M, Kwong K K, Salonen O and Wolf G L 1995 IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 14 480.
  • 4Bandettini P A, Jesmanowicz A, Wong E C and Hyde J S 1993 Magn. Reson. Med. 30 161.
  • 5Friston K, Jezzard P and Turner R 1994 Hum. Brain Mapp. 1 153.
  • 6Wang H Y, Hu J, Xie Y Q, Chen J, Yu A, Wei X H, Dai Y M, Li M, Bao S L and Haacke E M 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 038702.
  • 7Yu S D, Wu S B and Xie Y Q 2013 Comput. Math. Method M. 2013 202309.
  • 8Thireou T, Kontaxakis G, Strauss L G, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pavlopoulos S and Santos A 2005 Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 43 23.
  • 9Zhu F, Rodriguez G D, Carpenter T, Atkinson M and Wardlaw J 2013 IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17 950.
  • 10Haacke E M, Li M and Juvvigunta F 2013 Magn. Reson. Imaging 31 481.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部