《黄帝内经》与《希波克拉底文集》关于疮疡认识的比较研究

Comparison Researches on Sore in Huang Di Nei Jing and The Hippocratic Corpus

通过对《黄帝内经》与《希波克拉底文集》中关于疮疡病的病因病机、治则治法的比较,发现二者都认识到外伤的病因,都强调了祛除瘀血脓水的治疗原则,并应用引脓放血及外敷的治法,在认识上存在相似性。但《内经》从饮食情志等方面更全面地认识疮疡的病因,注重气滞血瘀的病机,施以内外合治。《希氏文集》则侧重保持创面干燥清洁,以外治为主。这都反映出古代东西方医学在思维方式和哲学背景上的某些差异。

Both in Huang Di Nei fling and The Hippocratic Corpus, there had been some similarities about sore diseases, emphasizing treatment principals on dispelling stasis and purulent fluid, treatment methods on guiding purulent blood and external application, through comparing causes and pathological mechanisms. However, we found out that etiological factors were emphasized as Qi and blood stasis, combing with internal and external treatments on accommodation, psychological factors in Huang Di Neifling. While in The Hippocratic Corpus, external treatments were maintained as dry and hygienic conditions of injured areas. All these suggested some difference on ideological methods and philosophic backgrounds between eastern medicine and western medicine.