期刊文献+

罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼用于全膝关节置换术后硬膜外镇痛效果观察

Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty with ropivacaine and sufentanil
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因在全膝关节置换(TKA)术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的效果观察。方法:选择80例ASAI^II级全膝关节置换术后患者,随机分为4组,L组、S1组、S2组、S3组,实施患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA),L组为0.1%罗哌卡因50 ml,S1组为0.1%罗哌卡因50 ml(含舒芬太尼0.25μg/ml),S2组为0.1%罗哌卡因50 ml(含舒芬太尼0.5μg/ml),S3组为0.1%罗哌卡因50 ml(含舒芬太尼0.75μg/ml),观察并记录术后1 h、6 h、12 h、24 h休息与被动运动的视觉模拟评分(VAS),同时记录低血压、恶心/呕吐、瘙痒等不良反应。结果:术后休息与被动运动的疼痛评分(VAS)均<2.5。术后瘙痒的发生率S1组明显低于S2组、S3组。结论:S1组(0.1%罗哌卡因+舒芬太尼0.25μg/ml)术后瘙痒的发生率明显降低。因此,TKA术后PCEA镇痛的最适剂量为舒芬太尼0.25μg/ml。 Objective To investigate the effects sufentanil in total knee arthroplasty( TKA). Method Eighty patients scheduled for TKA were enrolled for the study. Seventy-one patients( ASA physical status Ⅰ -Ⅱ) were randomly allocated into four groups: group L,group S1,group S2 and group S3. All groups received 0. 1% ropivacaine through PCEA and three of these groups received sufentanil( group S1: sufentanil 0. 25 μg / ml,group S2: sufentanil 0. 5 μg / ml,and group S3: sufentanil 0. 75 μg / ml). Postoperative pain scores were evaluated using VAS( visual analog scale,0 -10) and side effects such as hypotension,nausea / vomiting,pruritus were evaluated at 1,6,12,24 hours after PCEA started. Results Postoperative pain scores at rest and on mobilization were 2. 5 at all times which we considered to represent satisfactory pain management. The incidence of pruritus was significantly lower in group S1 than in groups S2 and S3. Conclusion The incidence of side effects were significantly lower in group S1( 0. 1% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0. 25 μg / ml). Therefore,0. 25 μg / ml of sufentanil through PCEA is the recommended dose for postoperative pain control in TKA.
作者 张博 耿立成
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2015年第17期3781-3782,共2页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FENTANYL ROPIVACAINE SUFENTANIL Epidural analgesia Fentanyl Ropivacaine Sufentanil
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献15

  • 1许力,岳建英,黄宇光,罗爱伦.剖宫产术后患者左旋布比卡因、罗哌卡因与布比卡因混合芬太尼硬膜外镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(11):813-815. 被引量:42
  • 2庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004∶ 7.
  • 3Bariskanner H, Ayaz M, Guney FB, et al. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine: comparative effects on nerve conduction block [J]. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol, 2007,29(5):337-341.
  • 4Di Cianni S, Rossi M, Casati A, et al. Spinal anesthesia : an evergreen technique[J].Acta Biomed ,2008,79(1):9-17.
  • 5van Kleef JW, Veering BT, Burm AG. Spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine: a doubleblind study on the efficacy and safety of 0.5% and 0.75% solutions in patients undergoing minor lower limb surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 1994,78(6):1125-1130.
  • 6Lee YY, Ngan Kee WD, Chang HK,et al. Spinal ropivacaine for lower limb surgery: a dose response study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2007, 105 (2): 520-523.
  • 7Lee YY, Ngan Kee WD, Muchhalk K, et al. Randomized double- blind comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia for urological Surgery [J]. Acta Anaesthesio Scand ,2005, 49(10):1477-1482.
  • 8刘俊杰,赵俊.现代麻醉学[M].北京:科学出版社,1996:824-825.
  • 9Fong HK, SandsLP, LeungJM. The role of postoperatire analgesia in delirium and cognitive decline inelderly patients: a systematic review. Anesth Analg,2006,102 : 1255 - 1266.
  • 10Rosenberg PH, Kytta J, Alile A, et al. Absorption of bupivacaine, etidocaine, lignocaine and ropivacaaine into N - heptane rat sciaticnever,and human extradural and subcutaneous fat. Br J Anaesth,1986,58:310 -314.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部