两种宫内节育器避孕效果比较

Two Kinds of Intrauterine Device Contraceptive Effect Comparison

目的比较安舒环和爱母环两种宫内节育器的临床避孕效果。方法对该站2012年1月—2014年1月收治400例自愿要求避孕的育龄妇女,按照自愿的原则,分为观察组和对照组,随访12个月,观察使用效果及不良反应。结果观察组200例,因症取出1例,占0.5%,脱落1例,占0.5%,续用195例,占97%;对照组200例,因症取出10例,占5%,脱落20例,占5.5%,续用170例,占85%,观察组因症取出率、脱落率低于对照组,续用率高于对照组,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组带器妊娠1例,占0.5%,对照组5例,2.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后1个月、3个月、6个月不良反应发生率分别为4.00%、3.50%、2.0%低于对照组16.00%、16.00%、7.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论安舒环避孕效果更好,不良反应发生率更低,且有助于降低远期妇科疾病发病风险。

Objective Compare phil anschutz ring and mother love ring clinical contraceptive effect of two kinds of in- trauterine device. Methods For I stand in January 2012 - January 2014 treated 400 cases of voluntary requirements of con- traception among women of reproductive age, according to the principle of voluntary control, divided into observation group and control group, were followed up for 12 months, observation using effect and adverse reactions. Results Observation group have 200 examples, take out 1 case because of illness ＂, accounted for 0.5%, fall off in 1 case, 0.5%, with 195, accounting for 97%; Control group of 200 cases for disease out 10 cases （5%）, and fall off 20 cases, accounted for 5.5%, in 170, accounting for 85%, observation group for disease remove rate and loss rate is lower than the control group, powerusageeffectiveness is higher than the control group, comparing the two groups have statistical significance （P〈0.05）; Observation group with preg- nancy in 1 case, 0.5%, control group 2.5%, 5 cases were in the two groups was no statistical significance （P〉0.05）; Observation group after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and incidence of adverse reactions were 4.00%, 3.50%, 2.0% lower than the control group 16.00%, 16.00%, 7.00%, statistically significant difference （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Phil anschutz ring contraceptive effect better, lower incidence of adverse reactions, and helps to reduce the long-term risk of disease of department of gynae- cology.