期刊文献+

科研众包参与主体及流程的特殊性 被引量:21

Speciality of Participants and Process of Crowdsourcing Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究对现有众包平台进行分类和比较,提出科研众包在参与主体和业务流程两个方面的特殊性。在参与主体方面,科研众包平台具有明显的中介作用、科研问题发布者的身份多样化和问题解决者获得较为丰富的经济报酬;在业务流程方面,科研众包任务的发布更加严格、科研问题解决者的专业性要求更强、科研问题解决方案的选择更加复杂。在特殊性分析的基础上,提出政策建议:科研众包需要按照应用型和研究型分类运营,科研众包任务需要分解和模块化。 Crowdsourcing is an internet-based open innovation. In this study, the existing crowdsourcing platform was classified and compared. It found research crowdsourcing particularity in both participants and business processes. In terms of participants, research crowdsourcing platform has a significant intermediary role in the publisher's identity research question and problem solvers diversification to obtain a more substantial economic return. In business processes, research crowdsoureing tasks have more stringent release, research problem solver requires more professional and scientific problem-solving has more complex options. On the basis of the special nature of the analysis, policy recommendations are given.
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期16-21,32,共7页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"领导行为作用下技术二元创新与商业模式匹配机理研究"(71472172) 四川省软科学项目"面向创新共同体的科技管理政策创新研究"(2015ZR0167)
关键词 科研众包 参与主体 业务流程 任务分解 Crowdsourcing Participants Business processes Task decomposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Wikipedia A.Crowdsourcing[DB/OL].[2010-10-11].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing.
  • 2Brabham D C.Crowdsourcing as Amodel for Problem Solving:an Introduction and Cases[J].The International Journal of Research into New Media Technololgies,2008,14(1):75-90.
  • 3本刊编辑部,张九庆.科研众包对中国科研活动的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2015(3):1-1. 被引量:24
  • 4Baron D.Private Ordering on the Internet:the eBay Community of Traders[J].Business and Politics,2002,4(3):245-274.
  • 5Hippel V E.Democratizing Innovateeeion[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,2005:66-87.
  • 6Simard C,West J.Knowledge Networks and the Geographicocus of Innovation[M].Open Innovation:Researching a New Paradigm,2006:220-240.
  • 7Hagel J,Brown J S.The Next Wave of Open Innovation[J].Business Week Online,2009,8:17.
  • 8Schenk E,Guittard C.Towards a Characterization of Crowdsourcing Practices[J].Journal of Innovation Economics & Management,2011(1):93-107.
  • 9赵付春,邓少军.社交媒体对科技创新网络的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2015(2):32-36. 被引量:7
  • 10王丽伟,田剑,刘德文.基于网络社区的创新竞赛绩效影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(2):17-24. 被引量:18

二级参考文献87

  • 1韩建军,程玉,郭耀煌.基于非对称成本的设计竞赛博弈模型及奖金设置[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):84-90. 被引量:7
  • 2Bullinger AC,Neyer AK, Rass M,et al. Community-based in- novation contests : where competition meets cooperation [ J ]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2010, 19 ( 3 ) : 290 - 303.
  • 3Che Y K, Gale I. Optimal design of research contests[ J ]. A- merican Economic Review ,2003,93 (3) :646 - 671.
  • 4Terwiesch C, Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innovation and multiagent problem solving [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 54(9) :1529 - 1543.
  • 5Boudreau K J, Lacetera N,Lakhani K R. Incentives and prob-lem uncertainty in innovation contests:an empirical analysis [ J ]. Management Science ,2011,57 ( 5 ) : 843 - 863.
  • 6DiPalant:no D, Vojnovic M. Crowdsourcing arid all-pay auc- tions[ C]. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Elec- tronic commerce. Stanford, CA ,2009,7:6 - 10.
  • 7Yang Y, Chen P, Pavlou P. Open innovation: an empiric',d study of online contests[ C]. Proceedings of thirteenth interna- tional conference on information systems. Pheenix:2009.
  • 8Moldovanu B ,Sela A. The optimal allocation of prizes in con- tests[ J]. The American Economic Review,2001,91 ( 3 ) : 542 -558.
  • 9Moldovanu B ,Sela A. Contests architecture[ J]. Journal of E- conomy Theory, 2006,126 ( 1 ) :70 - 96.
  • 10Matros A. Elimination tournaments where players have fixed resources[ Z ]. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh,2005.

共引文献296

同被引文献140

引证文献21

二级引证文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部