期刊文献+

民法典总则编“法律行为”一章学者建议稿的编写说明 被引量:25

Explanations on the Scholars' Draft of the Chapter on "Legal Act" in the General Principles of the Chinese Civil Code
原文传递
导出
摘要 民法典总则编之中,法律行为制度的设计,不论是体系结构还是具体条文的编写,都对民法整体功能具有核心价值。法律行为得以建立的法思想渊源,是人文主义革命以来得以确立的民事主体对于自己权利义务甚至法律责任的选择权和决定权。按照这种法思想确立的意思自治原则,在确定法律行为整体结构和具体制度上发挥决定性作用。我国现有立法在法律行为理论的接受方面的主要不足,恰恰在于未能全面地接受法律行为制度的法思想基础,因而在现行立法的制度体系和条文设计中未能全面贯彻法律行为理论。现行立法在行为主体的类型划分方面存在不足。现行立法在贯彻作为民法基本权利类型的支配权和请求权的划分方面,只承认请求权的法律行为根据,而不承认支配权的法律行为根据,在关于现代人事关系、人身关系方面,未能接受法律行为作为根据。这些缺陷应当在编纂民法典总则编时予以弥补。 The design of the institution of legal act in the title on General Principles of the Chinese Civil Code, whether in terms of institutional structure or in terms of the formulation of concrete provi- sions, is of absolute core value to the macro-function of the Chinese civil law. The concept of legal act is based on the legal thinking about the right of civil subjects to choose and decide their own rights, obligations, even legal responsibilities, established since the Humanism Movements. The principle of the autonomy of will, established according to this legal thinking, plays a decisive role in the determi- nation of the overall structure and the concrete institution of legal act. The main deficiency in the cur- rent Chinese legal theory with respect to the acceptance of the theory of legal act lies exactly in its failure to accept in a thorough and complete way the ideological basis of the institution of legal act, which leads to the failure of the current legislation to embody in a thorough and complete way the the- ory of legal act in the design of the overall system and concrete legal provisions. For example, the current Chinese legislation recognizes only the legal-act basis of the right of claim, but not that of the right of control, in the division between the right of control and the right of claim, which are the basic rights in civil law, and it fails to accept the legal -act basis of modern personal relations. The article puts forward suggestions on the construction of the institution of legal act in the General Principles of the Chinese Civil Code with a view to remedying the defects in the current legislation.
作者 孙宪忠
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期53-64,共12页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 民法典 民法总则 法律行为 意思自治 负担行为 处分行为 Civil Code, General Principles of Civil Law, legal act, autonomy of will, act of debt,act of disposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献49

  • 1《人民法院报》2002年7月2日,第5版,《现在开庭》栏目.
  • 2史尚宽.《民法总论》[M].,1980年自版.第42页.
  • 3[德]曼弗雷德·沃尔夫 吴越 李大雪译.《物权法》[M].法律出版社,2002年版.第387页.
  • 4谢在全.《民法物权》上册,第64页.
  • 5星野英一.《民法概论》Ⅱ(1980).[日]我妻荣.《日本物权法》,有泉亨修订,台湾五南图书出版公司1999年版,第53页.
  • 6高岛平臧.《物权法制的基础理论》,敬文堂1986年版,第69页以下.
  • 7洪逊欣.《中国民法总则》,1981年第11版,第288页.
  • 8D.50, 17, 85; Emmerich, s.5.第57页以下.
  • 9Larenz.Schuldrecht.Bd.I.Allgemeiner Teil 1976.11.a.88.
  • 10See Patriek.S.Atiyah, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract, Clarendon Press, 716(1979). p.778,771.

共引文献222

同被引文献440

引证文献25

二级引证文献359

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部