期刊文献+

智能汽车自动紧急控制策略 被引量:19

Autonomous Emergency Control Algorithm for Intelligent Vehicles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合驾驶员在紧急工况下的驾驶行为以及不同避撞方式的避撞效能,对以自动紧急制动系统(Autonomous Emergency Braking,AEB)为代表的控制策略进行分析,发现当前的紧急制动控制策略并不能很好地适应驾驶员行为和满足避撞效能的需要.为此,提出了一种融合制动控制和转向控制的自动紧急控制(Autonomous Emergency Control,AEC)策略.在该策略中驾驶员始终在环,系统通过集成驾驶员模型、车辆模型和道路环境模型信息判断驾驶员的行为是否正确,并将控制输入与驾驶员输入叠加在一起作为车辆的输入对驾驶员不当驾驶行为进行纠正. The algorithm of AEB (autonomous emergency control) was analyzed based on driver behaviors and effectiveness of different collision avoidance maneuvers. The results show that the current emergency braking algorithm cannot well adapt to driver behaviors under emergency conditions and the potential of collision avoidance is also limited. Therefore, in this paper an autonomous emergency control (AEC) algorithm, which integrated braking and steering control, was proposed. In this algorithm the driver is always in the loop and the information of driver model, while the vehicle model and road environment model are integrated to determine the appropriateness of the driver's behavior. The resulting corrective control input, which added to the driver's input, is then used to correct the driver's inappropriate behavior.
作者 李霖 朱西产
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期1735-1742,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
关键词 自动紧急控制 智能汽车 主动安全 先进驾驶辅助系统 控制策略 autonomous emergency control intelligent vehicle active safety advanced driver assistance systems control algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Treat J R, Tumbas N S, Mcdonald S T, et al. Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents [R]. Ann Arbor: Transport Research Institute (UMTRD, 1979.
  • 2VollrathM, Briest S, Schieβ1 C, et at. Ableitung yon Anforderungen an Fahrerassistenzsysteme aus Sicht der Verkehrssicherheit[R]. Bergisch Gladbach: BAST , 2006.
  • 3Distner M, Bengtsson M, Broberg T, et al. City safety a system addressing rear-end collisions at low speeds[C/CD]// Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Washington D C: NHTSA, 2009.
  • 4Bogenrieder R, Fehring M, Bachmann R. Pre-Safe, in rear- end collision situations [C/CD]// Proceedings of The 21stInternational Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV). Washington D C: NHTSA, 2009.
  • 5European New Car Assessment Program (Euro-NCAP). Test protocol - AEB systems, version 1.0 [S]. Brussels: Euro- NCAP, 2013.
  • 6Eckert A, Hartmann B, Sevenich M, et al. Emergency steer & brake assist., a systematic approach for system integration of two complementary driver assistance systems [C/CD]//Proc 22nd Int Technical Conf Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington D C: NHTSA, 2011.
  • 7Malaterre G, Ferrandez F, Fleury D, et al. Decision making in emergency situations[J]. Ergonomics, 1988, 31(4).- 643.
  • 8Maurer M. Forward collision warning and avoidance [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
  • 9公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2011年度)[R].北京:公安部交通管理局,2012.
  • 10Rutquist P E, Edvall M M. Propt-matlab optimal control software [-R]. Seattle: Tomlab Optimization Inc, 2009.

共引文献7

同被引文献177

引证文献19

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部