期刊文献+

从洛克到休谟:论英国政治社会思路的转向 被引量:6

From Locke to Hume:The Turning Direction of English Political Thoughts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从洛克到休谟,英国政治社会的思路发生了重要转向。洛克从基督教的信仰结构中构建自由宪政的根基,但为后世的党派之争埋下了激进的种子。休谟从经入史,经史结合研究政治社会,在历史中寻找事物变易的轨迹和哲学推理的经验基础,开辟了英国新的自由传统。本文以对洛克和休谟的思想诠释为出发点,重返英国政治社会的经典问题,借此来为理解英国社会理论中更为丰富的面向提供某种线索,也为中国现代转型问题提供某种治学启发。 Studies on English social theories tend to emphasize utilitarianism as their main trait, ignoring the diverse and complicated change and fusion in history. After experiencing wars and revolutions, England was obliged to search for new ideas and ways in response to the new social reality without abandoning its intellectual tradition. In the early 18th century, the infusion of Scottish enlightenment dramatically changed the political society of English Puritan tradition and introduced something new based on the emerging civil commercial society. Locke's ideas of natural law and freedom constitution are within the paradigm of Christianity. His Puritan tradition planted seeds for future radicalism. Hume's "science of man" revealed the common course of things and presented political science as a product of philosophical reasoning upon historical facts. This is an important turning point in English history of political thoughts. From classics to human history, Hume gave us a solid foundation of philosophical reasoning and opened up a new way of social and political studies:a new liberal tradition in English political thoughts. This paper tries to map out these changes in England political thoughts from Locke to Hume by a close examination of the two important Philosophers' ideas. Lessons can be learnt from this study as China is currently experiencing a transition much similar to the one England had experienced.
作者 杨璐
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期58-84,共27页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
关键词 宪制 政治社会 财产权 自由 混合政体 constitution, political society, property, liberty, mixed government
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1波考克,约翰.2012.德行、商业和历史:18世纪政治思想与历史论辑[M].冯克利,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
  • 2波考克,约翰.2013.马基雅维利时刻:佛罗伦萨政治思想和大西洋共和主义传统[M].冯克利、傅乾,译.南京:译林出版社.
  • 3盖伊,彼得.2015.启蒙时代[M].刘北成,译.上海人民出版社.
  • 4拉斯莱特,彼得.2007.洛克(政府论两篇)导论[M].冯克利,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
  • 5罗伯茨,克莱顿、威廉·罗伯茨、道格拉斯·比松.2013.英国史(一卷)[M].潘兴明,译.北京:商务印书馆.
  • 6洛克.政府论(下篇)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2009.
  • 7洛克.人类理解论[M].关文运,译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.
  • 8孟德斯鸠 婉玲译.罗马盛衰原因论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995..
  • 9萨托利.政党与政党体制[M].王明进译,北京:商务印书馆,2006.
  • 10休谟,大卫.2010.人性论(下册)[M].关文运,译.北京:商务印书馆.

二级参考文献55

  • 1施特劳斯.《自然权利与历史》,北京:三联书店,2003年,第84,86,92,92-93,122-123页.
  • 2洛克.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,中译本见《人类理解论》,关文运译,北京:商务印书馆,1983年,第80页.
  • 3托克维尔.《论美国的民主》,董果良译,北京:商务印书馆,1988年,第450页.
  • 4罗桑瓦龙,皮埃尔,2012,《法兰西政治模式》,高振华译,北京:三联书店.
  • 5卢梭:《论人与人之间不平等的起因与基础》,李平沤译,北京:商务印书馆,2007年,第38、72、75页.
  • 6卢梭,2006,《社会契约论》,何兆武译,北京:商务印书馆.
  • 7卢梭,2011,《论科学与艺术的复兴是否有助于使风俗日趋纯朴》,李平沤译,北京:商务印书馆.
  • 8涂尔干.《盂德斯鸠与卢梭》,李鲁宁等译,上海.上海人民出版社,2006年,第75页.
  • 9阿隆,雷蒙.2000,《社会学主要思潮》,葛智强,等译,北京:华夏出版社.
  • 10登特列夫.2008,《自然法--法律哲学导论》,葛智强、胡秉诚、王沪宁,译,北京:新星出版社.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部