期刊文献+

许可收入最大化下专利联盟对企业的序贯创新影响研究 被引量:3

Research on the effect of patent alliance on enterprise's sequential innovation based on maximization of license revenue
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以许可收入最大化为视角,构建了序贯创新条件下的累积互补性索偿权模型,研究专利联盟对企业序贯创新行为的影响问题。研究发现:专利联盟稳定存在时,随着联盟成员增多,专利联盟对企业序贯创新的激励作用逐渐减弱,但仍然高于仅有专利保护的情况;而专利联盟内生结构则要求为保持联盟稳定性需强制形成联盟,以实现激励作用;而在专利保护期限有限情况下,专利联盟对企业序贯创新的影响只与研发成本有关。最后给出了最优专利保护期限。 This paper builds a model of complementary cumulative claims of unlimited length of patents based on the maximization of license revenue, and studies the effect of patent alliance on the sequential innovation of the enterprise. It is shown that with the increasing of the member number of patent alli- ance, the possibility of innovation is reducing, but still higher than the regimes of patents; since the patent alliance structure is determined by endogenous factors, it is necessary to force to form patent alliance to realize the motivation function; and when the length of patents is limited, the effect of patent alliance on the sequential innovation of the enterprise only depends on the R&D cost. The perfect length is found.
出处 《合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期1559-1563,共5页 Journal of Hefei University of Technology:Natural Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目(11YJA630167) 安徽省软科学研究计划资助项目(1402052017)
关键词 专利联盟 序贯创新 创新效应 许可收入 patent alliance sequential innovation innovation effect license revenue
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Lerner J, Tirole J. Efficient patent pools[J]. American E conomic Review, 2004,94(3): 691-711.
  • 2Lampe R L, Moser P. Do patent pools encourage innova- tion? Evidence from the 19th-century sewing machine in- dustry[J]. Journal of Economic History, 2010, 70 ( 4 ) : 898-920.
  • 3Lampe R L, Moser P. Patent pools and the direction of technical change: evidence from the 19th-eentury sewing machine industry [R]. California: Stanford University, 2009.
  • 4Hopenhayn H, Llobet G, Mitchell M. RewaMing sequen- tial innovators: prizes, patents, and buyouts[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2006,114(6) : 1041-1068.
  • 5O'Donoghue T, Scotchmer S, Thisse J. Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress[J]. Jour- nal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1998, 7 (1) ; 1-32.
  • 6赵惠芳,杨苏,徐晟.专利最优保护期限的经济学分析[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,31(7):1037-1041. 被引量:4
  • 7杜晓君,马大明,宋宝全.专利联盟的序贯创新效应研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(2):48-57. 被引量:12
  • 8Brenner S. Optimal formation rules for patent pools[J]. E- conomic Theory, 2009, 40(3): 373-388.

二级参考文献25

  • 1石磊,马士国.专利保护期限设置的技术经济分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,22(12):44-49. 被引量:11
  • 2周英男,王雪冬.中国发明专利最优保护期的经济学分析[J].科学学研究,2006,24(3):417-420. 被引量:7
  • 3Brenner S. Optimal formation rules for patent pools[J].Eco- nomic Theory, 2009, 40(3): 373-388.
  • 4Clarkson G. Ohjective identification of patent thickets: A net- work analytic approach[D]. Boston: Harvard Business School Doctoral Thesis, 2004.
  • 5Lerner J, Tirole J. Efficient patent pools[J]. American Econ- omic Review, 2004, 94(3): 691-711.
  • 6Shapiro C. Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, pat- ent pools, and standard-setting[C]. Washington: NBER Con- ference on Innovation Policy and Economy, 2001:119-150.
  • 7Carlson S. Patent pools and the antitrust dilemma[J). Yale Journal on Regulation, 1999, 16(2): 359-399.
  • 8Kim S H. Vertical structure and patent pools[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2004, 25(3): 231-250.
  • 9Kato A. Patent pool enhances market compelition[J]. Intern- ational Review of Law and Economics, 2004, 24(2):255-268.
  • 10Quint D. Economies of patent pools when some (but not all) patents are essential[D]. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin- Madison, 2008.

共引文献14

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部