期刊文献+

SCR系统对公交车NO_X排放降低效果的研究 被引量:16

A Research on the NO_X Reduction Effects of SCR Systems in City Buses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用便携排放测试系统测试了3辆带有SCR系统的公交车在实际运行条件下的NO_x排放,对比喷射和不喷射尿素两种情况下的NO_x排放因子,计算了SCR系统对NO_x的降低率。结果表明:国Ⅳ柴油车由于其排气温度低,催化剂体积小,SCR系统对NO_x的降低率最低,只当车速高于30 km/h以后才能逐步显现出催化效果,NO_x平均降低率只有10%;国V天然气车SCR系统对NO_x的降低率最高,它在低速时排气温度就很高,且NO_x排放中NO_2的比例较高,使其SCR系统对NO_x的降低率基本上不随车速而变化,NO_x平均降低率达85%;国V柴油车介乎两者之间,使其SCR系统对NO_x的降低率约为70%。至于NO_x+HC排放,则是国V柴油车最低,国Ⅳ柴油车最高,国V天然气车由于其甲烷的排放量很高,使其NO_x+HC排放接近而稍低于国Ⅳ柴油车。 NOX emissions from three buses with SCR systems are measured by using portable emission measurement system in real-world conditions, the NOX emission factors in both conditions ( with and without urea in-jection) are compared and their NOX reduction rates of SCR systems are calculated. The results show that the State-IV diesel bus has the lowest NOx reduction rate of SCR system due to its low exhaust temperature and less volume of catalyst, whose effects gradually become apparent only when vehicle speed is higher than 30km/h, with an average NOX reduction rate of only 10 %;the State-V CNG bus has the highest NOX reduction rate due to its high exhaust temperature even at low speed and higher proportion of NO2 in NOX emission, and its NOX reduction rate basically does not change with vehicle speed, resulting in an average NOX reduction rate of 85%; while the NOX reduction rate of State-V diesel bus is in-between with an average NOX reduction rate of around 70%. As for the emission of NOX+ HC, the lowest is the State-V diesel bus, the highest is the State-IV diesel bus, while the NOX+HC emission of State-V CNG bus, due to its high emission of methane, is close to but slightly lower than that of State-IV diesel bus.
出处 《汽车工程》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期1227-1231,1239,共6页 Automotive Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(51276021)资助
关键词 柴油机 SCR系统 天然气 NOX排放 实际道路测试 diesel engine SCR system natural gas NOX emission real road test
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kittelson D B, Watts W F, Johnson J P, et al. On-road Evaluation of Two Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Devices[ J]. Journal of Aero- sol Science, 2006,37(9) :1140-1151.
  • 2Van Setten B A, Makkee M, Moulijn J A. Science and Technology of Catalytic Diesel Particulate Filters[J~. Catalysis Reviews: Sci- ence and Engineering, 2001,43 ( 4 ) :489-564.
  • 3Singer B C, Harley R A. A Fuel Based Motor Vehicle Emission In- ventory[ J ]. Journal of theAir & Waste Management Association, 1996,46(6) :481-493.
  • 4徐月云,李晶华,李孟良,孙龙,陈熊.国Ⅳ城市公交车NO_x排放特性的试验研究[J].汽车工程,2011,33(11):947-950. 被引量:9
  • 5Zheng G, Fila A, Kotrba A, et al. Investigation of Urea Deposits in Urea SCR Systems for Medium and Heavy Duty Trucks [ C ]. SAE Paper 2010-01-1941.
  • 6郭佳栋,葛蕴珊,谭建伟,韩秀坤,郝利君,余林啸.国Ⅳ公交车实际道路排放特征[J].环境科学研究,2014,27(5):477-483. 被引量:18
  • 7Koebel M, Elsener M, Kleemann M. Urea-SCR: A Promising Technique to Reduce NOx Emissions from Automotive Diesel En- gines [ J ]. Catalysis today, 2000,59 ( 3 -4 ) : 335 - 345.
  • 8帅石金,唐韬,赵彦光,华伦.柴油车排放法规及后处理技术的现状与展望[J].汽车安全与节能学报,2012,3(3):200-217. 被引量:134
  • 9Carslaw D C. Evidence of an Increasing NO2/NOx Emissions Ra- tio from Road Traffic Emissions [ J ]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005,39 (26) :4793-4802.
  • 10Metkar P S, Harold M P, Balakotaiah V. Selective Catalytic Re- duction of NOx on Combined Fe- and Cu-zeolite Monolithic Cata- lysts: Sequential and Dual Layer Configurations[ J ]. Applied Ca- talysis B : Environmental, 2012,111 (12) :67-80.

二级参考文献83

  • 1陈长虹,景启国,王海鲲,潘汉生,李莉,黄成,赵静,戴懿,黄海英,Matt Barth,Nick Nikkila.重型机动车实际排放特性与影响因素的实测研究[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(7):870-878. 被引量:57
  • 2中国环境保护部.中国机动车污染防治年报:2011年度[R].北京:中国环境保护部,2012:1-4.
  • 3CHANG Shihhsien,HSIEH Minyu, YANG Haojan,et al. Effects of diesel vehicle emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the surrounding environment and residents [ J ]. J Environ Sci Health Part C:Environmental Corcinogenesis and Ecotoxicology Reviews, 2009,27(3) :141-154.
  • 4WANG Guihua, BAI Song, OGDEN J M. Identifying contributions of on-road motor vehicles to urban air pollution using travel demand model data [ J ]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,2009, 14 ( 3 ) : 168-179.
  • 5RITCHIE G D,STILL K R,ALEXANDER W K,et al. A review of the neurotoxicity risk of selected hydrocarbon fuels [ J ]. Toxicol Environ Health Part B : Critical Reviews ,2001,4 ( 3 ) :223-312.
  • 6SEE S W, BALASUBRAMANIAN R, YANG T S, et al. Assessing exposure to diesel exhaust particles: a case study [ J ]. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A : Current Lssues, 2006,69 ( 21 ) : 1909-1925.
  • 7D'ANGIOLA A, DAWIDOWSKI L E, GOMEZ D R,et al. On-road traffic emissions in a megacity [ J ]. Atmos Environ, 2010,44 ( 4 ) : 483 -493.
  • 8WANG L, MORAWSKA L, JAYARATNE E R ,et al. Characteristics of airborne particles and the factors affecting them at bus stations [J]. Atmos Environ,2011,45(3) :611-620.
  • 9JOHANSSON C, BURMAN L, FORSBERG B. The effects of congestions tax on air quality and health [ J ]. Atmos Environ ,2009, 43(31 ) :4843-4854.
  • 10US Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR Parts 9 and 86 control of emissions of air pollution from new motor vehicles:in-use testing for heavy-duty diesel engines and vehicles [ S ]. Washington DC : EPA ,2005.

共引文献157

同被引文献132

引证文献16

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部