危险驾驶罪的教唆犯研究

A Study on the Instigator of Dangerous Driving Crime

教唆他人危险驾驶却产生交通肇事罪结果的情形,理论上有四种处理方式:一是根据行为共同说,在否定共犯对正犯故意的从属的基础上,肯定对过失犯的教唆来处理;二是根据法益保护前置化原理,将危险驾驶所致的交通肇事罪认定为故意犯罪,对致人伤亡的结果按客观的超过要素理论来处理;三是修正我国刑法以结果为本位来界定犯罪的责任形式,改之以行为为本位来界定犯罪的责任形式,将交通肇事罪认定为故意犯罪进行处理;四是认为交通肇事罪与危险驾驶罪具有行为和罪质上的结果加重关系,根据部分犯罪共同说进行处理。第一种处理方式无论从我国的立法技术还是从实质解释上来说都难以成立;第二种处理方式难以说明超过要素是否为交通肇事罪的构成要素,更难以说明行为人对致人死亡结果的认识或认识可能性属于什么性质;第三种处理方式可能导致现有刑法体系解体,刑法的安定性将失去保障。只有第四种处理方式符合现有刑法理论体系,实践上可行。

Instigation of dangerous driving which results in traffic accident can be punished in four ways according to law theories. The first is to assure the instigation of the negligence by denying the intentional subordination of the accomplice to the principal offender according to the theory of behavior in common. The second is to define the crime of causing traffic casualties as intentional offense,and deal with the casualties by objective extra factors according to theory of pre-protection of legal interest. The third is to replace outcome-based responsibility form with behavior-based liability form. The fourth is to handle it with the theory of partially joint crimes. Among them the fourth is applicable to China＇s current criminal theoretical system.