摘要
目的比较保守与微创穿刺治疗基底节脑出血疗效及安全性。方法选择该院2012年3月—2014年9月收治93例基底节脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组。对照组采取保守治疗,观察组对照组基础上采行微创穿刺治疗,比较两组治疗有效率、死亡率及治疗前后生活质量。结果观察组治疗有效率为91.5%,高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);无死亡病例,死亡率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前BI指数的比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),经治疗后观察组BI指数高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创穿刺治疗基底节区脑出血操作简便,可大幅降低死亡率,安全性高,患者术后生活质量获得提高,疗效显著,值得推广应用。
Objective To compare the curative effect and safety of conservative and minimally invasive puncture in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia. Methods 93 cases of patients with cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia admitted into our hospital from March 2012 to September 2014 were selected as the research object and randomly divided into two groups. The control group received the conservative treatment while the observation group adopted minimally invasive puncture treatment based on the control group. The effective rate of treatment and mortality and life quality before and after the treatment of two groups were compared. Results The effective rate of treatment of observation group was 91.5% which was higher than that of the control group and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05);there were no deaths and the mortality was lower than that of the control group and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05).The difference of BI index of the two groups before treatment was of no statistical significance (P〉0.05). After the treatment, the BI index of the observation group was higher than that of the control group and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The minimally invasive puncture on the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia is easy to operate and can greatly reduce the mortality. With high safety, it improves the quality of patients’ life after operation and the postoperative effect is significant. It’s worthy of promotion and application.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第18期19-20,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
保守治疗
微创穿刺
基底节脑出血
Conservative treatment
Minimally invasive puncture
Cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia