摘要
与清代阮元主编的《经籍籑诂》相比,2003年集体编撰出版的《故训汇纂》,在编排格式、检索便利、资料详备等方面,都有进步与创新。但我们不能因此而脱离历史实际去苛责阮元和他主编的《经籍籑诂》,甚至否定《经籍籑诂》的开创之功,以致对学术风气和学界后辈造成不良影响与误导。
This paper speaks with facts to show that Prof. Fubang Zong parades his doing and creates public opinions improperly about Gu Xun Hui Zuan, his compilation of ancient expository treatises. The way of false speculation on research makes a bad impact, misleading our academic community and younger generations. Prof. Zong made unwarranted charges against the predecessor Jing Ji Zhuan Gu, compiled by Yuan Ruan in the Qing Dynasty, with revivalism. This critical attitude is casual and flippant. Therefore, his conclusion does not conform to truths and should not be accepted in accordance with academic norms and characters of scholars. In addition to his negation ofJingJiZhuan Gu as an initiator and unassailable lead in this field, Prof. Zong is trying to replace it with his own compilation Gu Xun HuiZuan by announcing his work is a ＂masterpiece＂.
出处
《东方论坛（青岛大学学报）》
2015年第5期87-93,共7页
Eastern Forum（JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY）
