制度复杂理论研究进展及对中国管理研究的启示被引量：21

Review on Institutional Complexity and Implications for Chinese Management Research

下载PDF

导出

摘要转型中国作为构建制度复杂理论的最佳试验场所,可以从制度理论的演进过程出发讨论制度复杂理论的源起,并详细梳理制度复杂理论的内核所在:其关于制度逻辑异质性、动态性和历史权变性的基本假设,以及制度多中心性和制度逻辑多样性这两个基本概念;且重点探究场域层面制度复杂性的形成机制,以及组织对于制度复杂性的感知和回应这两个主要流派。此外,从企业层面出发,分析应该如何响应和改变制度复杂性,并从这两个角度提出3个制度复杂性视角下中国管理研究的方向。 Transitional China is one of the best fields for building institutional complexity theory. We first review the origin of institutional complexity theory from institutional theory, and propose the key assumptions （i. e. , heterogeneity, dynamic and historical dependence of institutional logics） and key concepts （i. e. , multiplicity of institutional logics, and Institutional Polycentrism） in institutional complexity theory. Then we review two main streams in the literature, namely, how the institutional complexity in field emerges, and how an organization interprets and responses to institutional com- plexity. Finally, we propose three main directions for Chinese management studies.

作者李晓丹刘洋

机构地区华南理工大学工商管理学院

出处《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期1741-1753,共13页 Chinese Journal of Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助青年项目(71502160 71502065) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2015BS15) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目(15NDJC115YB) 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划资助青年项目(GD14YGL02)

关键词制度复杂性制度逻辑组织战略中国管理研究 institutional complexity institutional logics organization strategy Chinese management studies

分类号 C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献74

1LUO Y. From 'West Leads East' to 'West Meets East': Philosophical Insights from Asia[C]//BOD- DEWYN J J. Multidisciplinary Insights from New AIB Fellows. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014: 3-28.
2GUAN J,ZHANG J, YAN Y. The Impact of Multi- level Networks on Innovation [J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3): 545-559.
3GREENWOOD R,DIAZ A M, LI S X, et al. The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heteroge- neity of Organizational Responses [J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(2): 521-539.
4BATJARGAL B,HITT M A, TSUI A S, et al. In- stitutional Polycentrism, Entrepreneurs' Social Net- works, and New Venture Growth[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(4): 1 024-1 049.
5MEYER J W, ROWAN B. Institutionalized Organi- zations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83 (2) : 340- 363.
6GREENWOOD R, RAYNARD M, KODEIH F, et al. Institutional Complexity and Organizational Re- sponses[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1): 317-371.
7THORNTON P H, OCASIO W. Institutional Logics [C] // GREENWOOD R, OLIVER C , SUDDABYR, et al. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Insti- tutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd, 2008:99-129.
8THORNTON P H, OCASIO W, LOUNSBURY M. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Ap- proach to Culture, Structure, and Process[M]. Ox- ford : Oxford University Press, 2012 : 1- 20.
9HOFFMAN A J. Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the US Chemical Industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42 (4) : 351-371.
10DIMAGGIO P J, POWELL W W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields [J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2) : 147-160.