期刊文献+

单因素实验法确定两种软磁合金镀铬的最佳工艺条件 被引量:2

Optimal chroming conditions of two soft magnetic alloys as determined by one-factor experimental method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:目前主要通过镀铬法提高软磁合金的抗腐蚀性能。目的:采用单因素实验法确定铁铬钼软磁合金和铁镍软磁合金表面镀铬的最佳工艺条件,提高其抗腐蚀能力。方法:铸造20 mm×20 mm×2 mm的方片状铁铬钼合金和铁镍合金各12片,表面经磨光、抛光、活化剂活化后进行镀铬,采用单因素实验法,选因素为电镀类型(分为6价铬和3价铬)、电流密度(15,20,25,35,40,45 A/dm2)和电镀时间(30,40,60 min),考查指标为镀层硬度和厚度,硬度和厚度值越大镀层的耐腐蚀性越强。扫描电子显微镜观察最佳工艺条件下制备的镀层形貌。结果与结论:两种软磁合金表面的6价铬镀层硬度和厚度均大于3价铬镀层,且6价铬镀层相对更均匀,说明电镀6价铬可以明显提高铁镍软磁合金和铁铬钼软磁合金的耐腐蚀性。当基材为铁铬钼软磁合金时,电镀6价铬的最佳工艺为电流密度45 A/dm2,电镀时间为60 min;电镀3价铬的最佳工艺为电流密度20 A/dm2,电镀时间为30 min。当基材为铁镍软磁合金时,电镀6价铬的最佳工艺条件为电流密度35 A/dm2,电镀时间为60 min;电镀3价铬的最佳工艺条件为电流密度20 A/dm2,电镀时间为40 min。 BACKGROUND: Chroming can improve the corrosion resistance of soft magnetic alloys. OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal chroming conditions of two soft magnetic alloys,Fe-Cr-Mo and Fe-Ni,so as to improve their corrosion resistance. METHODS: Twelve pieces of square-shaped Fe-Cr-Mo and Fe-Ni soft magnetic alloys were casted in the size of 20 mm×20 mm×2 mm. After sanding and polishing,chrome plating was performed on these specimens and the coating thickness and hardness were measured. The selection factors included electroplate type(hexavalent chromium and trivalent chromium),current density(15,20,25,35,40,45 A/dm^2) and electroplating time(30,40,60 minutes). The optimal chroming conditions were determined by one-factor experimental method and the chrome plating was observed under a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Cr^6+ coating was significantly better than Cr^3+ coating in the aspects ofhardness,thickness and uniformity,indicating Cr^6+ coating can significantly improve the corrosion resistance of Fe-Cr-Mo and Fe-Ni alloys. For Fe-Cr-Mo soft magnetic alloy,the optimal conditions of Cr^6+ coating were as follows: current density of 45 A/dm^2 and electroplating time of 60 minutes; the optimal conditions of Cr^3+ coating were as follows: current density of 20 A/dm^2 and electroplating time of 30 minutes. For Fe-Ni soft magnetic alloys,the optimal conditions of Cr^6+ coating were as follows: current density of 35 A/dm^2 and electroplating time of 60 minutes; the optimal conditions of Cr^3+ coating were as follows: current density of 20 A/dm^2 and electroplating time of 40 minutes.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第43期6966-6970,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 广东省科技厅社会发展项目(2011B080701010 2012B061700066)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1翁兴园.蓬勃发展的中国烧结钕铁硼永磁材料产业[J].新材料产业,2004(9):35-40. 被引量:2
  • 2郑元俐,魏斌,姚寒曦.衔铁与不同金属铸接前后金相结构的比较[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(4):416-418. 被引量:4
  • 3赵军,魏斌,李莹.3种不同金属铸接式衔铁磁力差异的比较[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(4):431-433. 被引量:2
  • 4朱智敏,杜启莲,安维彬,王绍钢.深冷处理对烤瓷镍铬合金耐腐蚀性能的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(2):203-206. 被引量:7
  • 5M Heydarzadeh Sohi,A A Kashi.Comparative Tribological Study of Hard and Crak-free Electrodeposited Chromium Coatings[J].Journal of Materals Processing and Technology,2003,138 (1-3):219-222.
  • 6Liping Wang,Yan Gao,Qunji Xue,et al.A Novel Electrodeposited Ni-P Gradient Deposit for Replacement of Conventional Hard Chromium[J].Surface and Coatings Technology,2006,200(12-13):3719-3726.
  • 7G A Lausmann.Electrolytically Deposited Hard Chrome[J].Surface and Coatings Technology,1996,(86-87):814-820.
  • 8Y B Song,D T Chin.Current Efficiency and Polarization Behavior of Trivalent Chromium Electrodeposition Process[J].Electrochimica Acta,2002,48(4):349-356.
  • 9Agnes Rousseau,Patrick Benaben.Electrochemical Study of a Trivalent Chromium Bath for Compositionally Modulated Multilayer Application[J].Metal Finishing,2002,100 (2):92-97.
  • 10S C Kwon,M Kim,S U Park,et al.Characterization of Intermediate Cr-C Layer Fabricated by Electrodeposition in Hexavalent and Trivalent Chromium Baths[J].Surface and Coatings Technology,2004,183(2-3):151-156.

共引文献23

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部