期刊文献+

桡骨远端不稳定骨折夹板固定与外固定支架的疗效对比 被引量:2

Efficacy splint fixtion and external fixation on unstable distal radius fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较夹板固定与外固定支架治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的疗效. 方法 选取2013年1月至2014年1月桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者74例,随机分为两组,对照组36例,采用夹板固定,观察组38例,采用外固定支架治疗,对比两组临床效果. 结果 观察组优良率为89.5%,对照组为优良率63.8%,两组比较差异有统计学意义( P〈0.05);观察组并发症发生率为5.3%,对照组并发症发生率为19.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义( P〈0.05). 结论 对桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者采用外固定支架治疗效果显著优于夹板固定治疗,可减少并发症,具有推广价值. Objective To compare the efficacy splint fixtion and external fixation on unstable distal radius frac-ture.Methods From January 2013 to January 2014, 74 cases of Unstable distal radius fractures were selected and were divided into two groups , 36 patients in the control group using the splint , 38 cases in the observation group receiving exter-nal fixator , the clinical effects of two groups were compared .Results Excellent rate in observation group was 89.5%, that was 63.8%in control group, there was significant difference (P〈0.05); the complication rate in observation group was 5.3%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (19.4%), the difference was significant (P〈0.05).Conclusions Unstable distal radius fractures treated with external fixation treatment is significantly better than splint treatment , it can reduce complications , so is worthy of promotion .
作者 刘明军
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2015年第23期68-69,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 桡骨远端不稳定骨折 夹板固定 外固定支架 Unstable distal radius fractures Splint External fixator
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

  • 1章亚东,侯树勋,李文锋,李振宙,张轶超,罗殿中,史亚民,吴海山.腕关节镜辅助可动力化外固定器技术治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(3):245-249. 被引量:25
  • 2张秋林,王秋根,张少成,纪方,王万宗,汤旭日,陆晴友,唐昊,吴剑宏,蔡晓冰.桡骨远端骨折的微创手术治疗[J].中华手外科杂志,2006,22(1):11-12. 被引量:40
  • 3贡小英,安贵生,高志强,李绍良,荣国威.CT在桡骨远端骨折诊断和治疗中的作用[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(20):1414-1416. 被引量:13
  • 4Tomaino MM, Elfar J. Ulnar impaction syndrome[J]. Hand Clin,2005,21(4):567-575.
  • 5Arora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, et al. Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar lockingplate[J], J Orthop Trauma, 2007,21 ( 5 ) : 316- 322.
  • 6Kapoor H, Agarwal A, Dhaon BK. Displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius: a comparative evaluation of results following closed reduction, external fixation and open reduction with internal fixation[J]. Injury, 2000,31 (2) : 75-79.
  • 7Rawes ML, Richardson JB, Hardy JR, et al. Dynamic versus static external fixation of distal radial fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Injury, 1995,26(2) : 140-151.
  • 8Hanel D P,Jones M D,Trumble T E.Wrist fractures.Orthop Clin North Am,2002,33:35-57.
  • 9Atroshi I,Brogren E,Larsson G U,et al.Wrist-bridging versus non-bridging external fixation for displaced distal radius fractures:a randomized assessor-blind clinical trial of 38 patients followed for 1 year.Acta Orthop,2006,77:445-453.
  • 10Margaliot Z,Haase S C,Kotsis S V,et al.A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures.J Hand Surg Am,2005,30:.1185-1199.

共引文献17

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部