期刊文献+

帕尼单抗与西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康治疗KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效分析 被引量:3

Panitumumab compared with cetuximab-irinotecan therapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较帕尼单抗与西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康疗法对KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效。方法纳入KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者35例,采用随机数字表法进行分组,随机分配方案隐藏,分别给予表皮生长因子受体抑制剂帕尼单抗(20例)和西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康(15例)治疗;统计学分析两组治疗方案疗效的差异。结果帕尼单抗组和西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康组部分缓解的患者分别为5例(25.0%)和4例(26.7%),差异无统计学意义(P=0.64);两组患者中位总生存期分别为8.3个月和8.5个月,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.161,P=0.13);多因素分析表明两种治疗方案对患者总生存期的影响差异无统计学意义(HR=1.17,95%CI为0.68~2.04,χ2=1.01,P=0.47);两组不良反应发生率分别为95%和100%(P=0.72)。结论帕尼单抗与西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康疗法对KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者治疗效果类似,可以作为对化疗抵抗结直肠肿瘤患者的三线治疗药物在临床上推广。 ObjectiveTo compare the curative effect of KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with either single agent panitumumab or combination therapy with cetuximab and irinotecan. MethodsUsing the random number table method (concealment of allocation), the study enrolled 35 patients with KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer, who had received epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, either panitumumab (20 cases) or combination cetuximabirinotecan (15 cases). The differences of curative effect between groups were assessed by statistical analysis. ResultsFive (25.0%) panitumumab and four (26.7%) cetuximabirinotecantreated patients had partial response, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.64). Median overall survival was 8.3 months for the panitumumab group and 8.5 months for the cetuximabirinotecan group (χ2=1.161, P=0.13). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that survival outcomes were similar regardless of the therapy selected and the difference was not statistically significant (HR=1.17, 95%CI: 0.682.04, χ2=1.01, P=0.47). 95% patients who received panitumumab and all cetuximabirinotecantreated patients (100%) experienced treatmentrelated adverse events (P=0.72). ConclusionThe drug therapy of panitumumab and cetuximabirinotecan treatment were similar to KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer patients and can be reasonable used as thirdline treatment options for patients with chemoresistant metastatic colorectal neoplasms.
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2015年第12期907-910,共4页 Journal of International Oncology
关键词 受体 表皮生长因子 结直肠肿瘤 药物疗法 Receptor, epidermal growth factor Colorectal neoplasms Drug therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Misale S, Di Nicolantonio F, SartoreBianchi A, et al. Resistance to antiEGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: from heterogeneity to convergent evolution[J].Cancer Discov.2014, 4(11):1269-1280.
  • 2Renouf DJ, Lim HJ, Speers C, et al. Survival for metastatic colorectal cancer in the bevacizumab era: a populationbased analysis[J].Clin Colorectal Cancer.2011, 10(2):97-101.
  • 3Ferrarotto R, Pathak P, Maru D, et al. Durable complete responses in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy alone[J].Clin Colorectal Cancer.2011, 10(3):178-182.
  • 4Misale S, Arena S, Lamba S, et al. Blockade of EGFR and MEK intercepts heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance to antiEGFR therapies in colorectal cancer[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2014, 6(224): 224ra26.
  • 5Tol J, Punt CJ. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review[J].Clin Ther.2010, 32(3):437-453.
  • 6Van Cutsem E, Khne CH, Láng I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as firstline treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status[J].J Clin Oncol.2011, 29(15):2011-2019.
  • 7Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ study of panitumumab with florouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (folfiri) compared with folfiri alone as secondline treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J].J Clin Oncol.2010, 28(31):4706-4713.
  • 8李敏敏,毕祥,王哲海.转移性结直肠癌抗EGFR单抗获得性耐药的研究进展[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2014,41(5):357-360. 被引量:3
  • 9Valtorta E, Misale S, SartoreBianchi AA, et al. KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFRtargeted therapy[J].Int J Cancer.2013, 133(5):1259-1265.
  • 10Huang J, Nair SG, Mahoney MR, et al. Comparison of FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab in patients with resected stage Ⅲ colon cancer; NCCTG (alliance) intergroup trial N0147[J].Clin Colorectal Cancer.2014, 13(2):100-109.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Bardelli A,Janne PA.The road to resistence:EGFR mutation and cetuximab[J].Nat Med,2012,18(2):199-200.
  • 2Montagut C,Dalmases A,Bellosillo B,et al.Identification of a mutation in the extra-cellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor conferring cetuximab resistence in colorectal cancer[J].Nat Med,2012,18(2):221-223.
  • 3Wheeler DL,Huang S,Kruser TJ,et al.Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab:role of HER (ErbB) family members[J].Oncogene,2008,27 (28):3944-3956.
  • 4Lu Y,Li X,liang K,et al.Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ubiquitination as a mechanism of acquired resistence escaping treatment by the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab[J].Cancer Res,2007,67 (17):8240-8247.
  • 5Misale S,Yaeger R,Hobor S,et al.Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer[J].Nature,2012,486(7404):532-536.
  • 6Diaz LA Jr,Williams RT,Wu J,et al.The molecular evolution of acquiredresistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers[J].Nature,2012,486 (7404):537-540.
  • 7Brand TM,Iida M,Wheeler DL.Molecular mechanisms of resistance to the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab[J].Cancer Biol Ther,2011,11(9):777-792.
  • 8Ciardiello F,Bianco R,Caputo R.Antitumor activity of ZD6474,a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor,in human cancer cells with acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy[J].Clin Cancer Res,2004,10 (2):784-793.
  • 9Vallb(o)hmer D,Zhang W,Gordon M,et al.Molecular determinants of cetuximab efficacy[J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23 (15):3536-3544.
  • 10Li C,Iida M,Dunn EF,et al.Nuclear EGFR contributes to acquired resistence to cetuximab[J].Oncogene,2009,28 (43):3801-3813.

共引文献2

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部