期刊文献+

控压钻井井口恒压控制方法初探 被引量:2

INITIAL INVESTIGATION OF CONSTANT WELLHEAD PRESSURE CONTROL METHOD IN MPD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实时准确控制井筒压力对于深部地层钻井安全至关重要。结合控压钻井工艺特性,提出了井口恒压控制方法,并建立了井筒-地层耦合流动模型。研究结果表明,与井底恒压模式相比,井口恒压模式可操作性更强,控制过程中井底压力会呈规律性的波动变化,并在气体前沿运移到井口时出现一个拐点。在现场作业时,需要结合安全钻井液密度窗口确定合理的井口回压调控区间。井口回压调控区间与溢流量监测值/地层渗透率呈负相关性,而与初始井口回压呈正相关性。文中研究对于提高控压钻井作业安全性有着一定的借鉴意义。 In the process of deep drilling,the real-time and precise control of bottomhole pressure has always been a critical issue to drilling safety. Combined with managed pressure drilling( MPD) technology features,constant wellhead pressure control method is proposed. And a wellbore-formation coupling flow model based on constant wellhead pressure control method is established. The results show that the constant wellhead pressure control method has better operability compared with constant bottomhole pressure( CBHP). During the process, bottomhole pressure fluctuates regularly and an inflexion occurs when the gas flows to the wellhead. Appropriate wellhead back pressure range can also be confirmed by integrating with safe mud window. The wellhead back pressure regulating range shows a negative correlation with overflow detecting level or formation permeability,while it shows a positive correction with initial wellhead back pressure. This study has some guiding significance to enhance safety in MPD operations.
出处 《钻采工艺》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第6期4-7,129,共4页 Drilling & Production Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"控压钻井测控理论及关键问题研究"(编号:51334003) 国家自然科学基金面上项目"深层碳酸盐岩地层与井筒耦合作用机理与压力自动控制方法研究"(编号:51274221) "控压钻井井筒多相流体瞬态变质量流动理论及工况解释方法研究"(编号:51274045) "基于模型预测控制理论与状态机架构的控压钻井压力控制方法研究"(编号:51374223)和"大兴场构造钻完井工艺技术研究"(编号:XNS05JS2015-37)联合资助
关键词 控压钻井 井口恒压 井底压力 井口回压 调控区间 managed pressure drilling,constant wellhead pressure,bottomhole pressure,wellhead back pressure,regulating range
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Piyush Shrivastav. An Integrated Approach Towards Well Control For a HPHT Well[ C]. OTC, 22885, 2012.
  • 2P. Vieira, F. Torres, R. A. Qamar, et al. Downhole Pressure Uncertainties Related to Deep Wells Drilling are Safely and Precisely Ascertained using Automated MPD Technology[C]. SPE 150944, 2012.
  • 3Nickens, H.V. A Dynamic Computer Model of a Kicking Well: Part II - Model Predictions and Conclusions [ C ]. SPE 14184 - MS, 1985.
  • 4Nickens, H.V. A Dynamic Computer Model of a Kicking Well[J]. SPE 14183-PA, 1987.
  • 5R. Rommetveit, E.H. Vefring. Comparison of Results From an Advanced Gas Kick Simulator With Surface and Downhole Data From Full scale gas kick experiments in an inclined well[ C]. SPE 22558, 1991.
  • 6R. Rommetveit. Kick Simulator Improves Well Control Engineering and planning[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 1994, 92(34) :64 -71.
  • 7Jose E. C, John R. S, Darryl Bourgoyne. A Simplified Method to Estimate Peak Casing Pressure during MPD Well Control C 1. SPE 147496, 2011.
  • 8H, Shi, J.A. Holmes, L.J. Durlofsky, et al. Drift- Flux Modeling of Multiphase Flow in Wellbores[ C]. SPE 84228 - MS, 2003.
  • 9何淼,柳贡慧,李军,张涛,李梦博,郭庆丰.控压钻井井底气侵停止与否实时判别方法研究[J].应用数学和力学,2015,36(8):865-874. 被引量:2
  • 10Avelar C. S. , Ribeiro P. R. , Sepehrnoori K. Deepwater gas kick simulation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2009, 67(1-2): 13-22.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Syltoy S,Eide S E,Berg P C, Torvund S, Larsen T, Fjeldberg H, Bjorkevoll K S, McCaskillJ W, Prebensen O I,Low E. Highly advanced multitechnical MPD concept extends achievableHPHT targets in the north sea [ C ] //SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbai-anced Operations Conference and Exhibition. Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2008.
  • 2Santos H M, Reid P I,Jones J L, McCaskill J. Developing the micro-flux control method—part 1 : system development, field test preparation, and results [ C ] //SPE/IADC Middle EastDrilling Technology Conference and Exhibition. Dubai, UAE, 2005.
  • 3Das A K,Smith J R,Frink P J. Simulations comparing different initial responses to kickstaken during managed pressure drilling [ C ] //IADC/SPE Drilling Conference. Orlando, Flori-da, USA, 2008.
  • 4Guner H. Simulation study of emerging well control methods for influxes caused by bottom-hole pressure fluctuations during managed pressure drilling [ D ] . Master Thesis. LouisianaState University, 2009.
  • 5Davoudi M,Smith J R, Patel B, Chirinos J E. Evaluation of alternative initial responses tokicks taken during managed pressure drilling[ C]//IADC/SPE DriUing Conference and Exhi-bition. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2010.
  • 6Bacon W,Tong A Y, Gabaldon O R,Sugden C, Suryanarayana P V. An improved dynamicwell control response to a gas influx in managed pressure drilling operations [ C ] //IADC/SPEDriUing Conference and Exhibition. San Diego, California, USA, 2012.
  • 7Hasan A R, Kabir C S. A study of multiphase flow behavior in vertical wells[ J]. SPEProduc-tion Engineering, 1988,3(2) : 263-272.
  • 8Perez-Tellez C,Smith J R,Edwards J K. A new comprehensive,mechanistic model for un-derbalanced drilling improves wellbore pressure predictions [ J ]. SPE DriUing and Comple-tion, 2003, 18(3) : 199-208.
  • 9YU Meng-jiao, Vgjargah A K, Miska S Z,Majidi R, Ozbayoglu M E. Taking the proper actionto gas influx during constant bottomhole pressure technique of managed pressure drilling[C]//Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas, USA, 2013.
  • 10DUAN Zhen-hao, MAO Shi-de. A thermodynamic model for calculating methane solubility,density and gas phase composition of methane-bearing aqueous fluids from 273 to 523 K andfrom 1 to 2000 bar[ J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2006, 70( 13) ; 3369-3386.

共引文献1

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部