作为符号的雷锋——形象变迁的社会符号学解读被引量：3

Lei Feng as a Sign:A Social Semiotic Interpretation of Image Change

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文以1963-2008年《人民日报》刊发的社论为分析对象,讨论了雷锋形象变迁的符号化建构过程。通过语料分析发现雷锋形象的符号化建构过程体现出既有延续又有变化的特点。本文还认为符号资源使用策略是主流意识形态约束和建构雷锋形象的一种手段,这不仅可以使雷锋形象传递出的意义有所不同,而且随着雷锋符号形象的集体记忆不断重塑,也可以使学雷锋活动历经50多年经久不衰。 This paper targets at the editorials published on People＇s Daily from 1963-2008 and discusses the changes of Lei Feng as social semiotic image. It is found that this semiotic construction process reveals a continuity as well as change of images. It is also believed that the strategy of the use of semiotic resources is a tool for predominant ideology to constrain and construct the Lei Feng image which, accompanying with the shaping and reshaping of the collective memory of the Lei Feng image, not only produces different meanings of the Lei Feng image, but also guarantees the continuity of learning-from-Lei-Feng activities.

作者赵芃

机构地区天津商业大学外国语学院

出处《天津外国语大学学报》 2015年第6期15-21,共7页 Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University

基金国家社科基金项目"中国学术话语体系的构建及其与国际学术话语的交流策略研究"(14BYY070)

关键词符号化建构雷锋形象集体记忆 semiotic construction, Lei Feng image, collective memory

分类号 H0-05 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory[M]. Edited & translated by Coser, L. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning[M]. Maryland. University Park Press.
3Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd Edition[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
4Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Hodder Arnold.
5Hodge, R. & G. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics [M]. Cambridge: Polity.
6Martin, J. & P. White. 2008. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7Thibault, P. 1991. Social Semiotics as Praxis: Text, Social Meaning Making, and Nabokov's Ada [M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics[M]. New York: Routledge.
9van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice: A New Tool for Critical Discourse Analysis[M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
10van Leeuwen, T. 2009. Discourse as Recontextualization of Social Practice: A Guide[A]. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer(eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis[C]. London: Sage. 144-161.

二级参考文献77

1M.福柯,莫伟民.主体性和真理[J].世界哲学,2005(1):42-45. 被引量：4
2徐赳赳.关于元话语的范围和分类[J].当代语言学,2006,8(4):345-353. 被引量：172
3Bauman, R. & C. Briggs. Poetics and Performance as Critical l'erspecuves on Language ann aocla ,,taj. , , Anthropology, 1990, (19).
4Bernstein, B. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse[M]. London: Routledge, 1990.
5Chilton, P., H. Tian & R. Wodak. Reflections on Discourse and Critique in China and the West[J]. Journal of Language and Politics, 2010, (4).
6Chouliaraki, L. & N. Fairelough. Discourse in Late Modernity[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
7Chung, A. & D. Wu. Between Tradition and Modernity: Image Representations of Women in Cosmopolitan, China[J]. Linguistic Research, 2012, (12).
8Crossley, N. Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory[M]. London: Sage, 2004.
9Fairclough, N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research[M]. London: Routledge, 2003.
10Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis and Marketization of Public Discourse[A]. In N. Fairclough (ed.) Critical Discourse Analysis[C]. London: Longman, 1995.